I think an Assault Slayer gametype would be pretty sweet

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. I think an Assault Slayer gametype would be pretty sweet

User Info: LordDamien27

LordDamien27
4 years ago#1
It would definitely make Ragnarok more playable imo. And make way for some more open maps. I mean, Hemorrhage in Reach was a nice map, but the DMRs killed it.
Dibs called on Phosphora - 4/2/12

User Info: darren19822000

darren19822000
4 years ago#2
LordDamien27 posted...
It would definitely make Ragnarok more playable imo. And make way for some more open maps. I mean, Hemorrhage in Reach was a nice map, but the DMRs killed it.


your idea of a good map scares me.
gt darren reefnugs

User Info: LordDamien27

LordDamien27
4 years ago#3
darren19822000 posted...
LordDamien27 posted...
It would definitely make Ragnarok more playable imo. And make way for some more open maps. I mean, Hemorrhage in Reach was a nice map, but the DMRs killed it.


your idea of a good map scares me.


I didn't say good. I said nice. It was aesthetically pleasing and had potential to be more fun than it was. It was by no means a competitive map.
Dibs called on Phosphora - 4/2/12

User Info: TorqueFork

TorqueFork
4 years ago#4
They tried assault in Reach.

DMRs did not ruin Blood Gulch/Coag/etc.
Uhh...check it...

User Info: SythisTaru

SythisTaru
4 years ago#5
Asslayer you mean!?

User Info: Protoman_X38

Protoman_X38
4 years ago#6
darren19822000 posted...
LordDamien27 posted...
It would definitely make Ragnarok more playable imo. And make way for some more open maps. I mean, Hemorrhage in Reach was a nice map, but the DMRs killed it.


your idea of a good map scares me.


You mean the very same map that had a lot to do with Halo's success?
567i3e7oe7klw5seksw5kjw5ejejetyjkretketkje5ykekeke,le6ulke3klke6ululeul
http://i.minus.com/ibyp8mPjN.gif

User Info: darren19822000

darren19822000
4 years ago#7
Protoman_X38 posted...
darren19822000 posted...
LordDamien27 posted...
It would definitely make Ragnarok more playable imo. And make way for some more open maps. I mean, Hemorrhage in Reach was a nice map, but the DMRs killed it.


your idea of a good map scares me.


You mean the very same map that had a lot to do with Halo's success?


yes because a whole gaming universe and sucess revolves around one mp map. one that isnt even considered the best halo map
gt darren reefnugs

User Info: Protoman_X38

Protoman_X38
4 years ago#8
darren19822000 posted...
Protoman_X38 posted...
darren19822000 posted...
LordDamien27 posted...
It would definitely make Ragnarok more playable imo. And make way for some more open maps. I mean, Hemorrhage in Reach was a nice map, but the DMRs killed it.


your idea of a good map scares me.


You mean the very same map that had a lot to do with Halo's success?


yes because a whole gaming universe and sucess revolves around one mp map. one that isnt even considered the best halo map


Ok then

but you don't have to be so rude ;)
567i3e7oe7klw5seksw5kjw5ejejetyjkretketkje5ykekeke,le6ulke3klke6ululeul
http://i.minus.com/ibyp8mPjN.gif
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. I think an Assault Slayer gametype would be pretty sweet

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived