SunDevil77 posted...Underachieving?
Gameplanet 11/05/12 8.5 out of 10
Gamer Limit 11/10/12 9 out of 10
GamesBeat 11/01/12 90 out of 100
GamesMaster UK 12/25/12 97 out of 100
GameSpot 11/01/12 9 out of 10
GamesRadar 11/01/12 4.5 out of 5
gamesTM 11/01/12 9 out of 10
GameTrailers 11/06/12 9 out of 10
Gaming Age 11/01/12 A
Gaming Nexus 11/01/12 8.5 out of 10
Just a few. Does not compute.
Canned reviews that mean nothing =/= proof
And there's an easy way to check this. Did any of those sources mention Mass Effect 3's awful ending when they reviewed that? I can already answer that, but I'm gonna check anyway, hang on...
Gameplanet - Web site is in gibberish, Spanish possibly, moving on
Gamer Limit - Doesn't mention the ending at all, nothing to see here.
GamesBeat - .... Alright, this place actually seems to have integrity. I can only assume a different person reviewed Halo 4.
GameMaster UK - Couldn't find the review section and Metacritic hasn't been working right for some reason, so I can't check there.
GameSpot - I refuse to even visit this website anymore and I'm almost positive they didn't mention the ending anyway.
GamesRadar - This one gets a half seal of approval. They mention the ending but gave it a 4.5 out of 5 anyway. All this really proves is that their scores don't mean much.
gameTM - Search function is a joke.
GameTrailers - GameTrailers has been lol for awhile.
Gaming Age - Another site with an awful search.
Gaming Nexus - Lol. Nothing to see here either.
So only 1 and a half of these sources get a pass. That's not good.
---
Bowser: Keeping it real for over 25 years.
Facebook | 
Twitter
