Just got done playing a few reach games, first time since halo 4 launch (11/5/12 for me since I got the game a day early). And I can honestly say that reach is better than H4. Don't get me wrong, reach is a terrible game, but it just feels more completed and looks more like a halo game compared to halo 4 to name a few reasons.
The only thing halo 4 did better than reach was reverting back to the H2/H3 shield system and using a normal speed and jump height, and changing the nade damage back to what a grenade should do in a halo game....that's pretty much it.
And inb4 the H4 fanboys/delusional/incoherent people that try to defend halo 4 for some strange reason, the proof is right in front of you.
And on another note, to the kids that's saying that Halo 3 is overrated/ or terrible is a few threads lately, is obviously garbage and terrible at the game. Just look at the history it had. Just because you're bad at the game and you don't have an armor ability doesn't mean the game is bad. Well never mind, people do tend to not like a game when they're constantly in the respawn screen for getting dumped on over and over again because they're bad. Halo 3 was by far the best game on xbox 360 and it would have continued to been until the next gen console came out if it was still populated. --- One of the best at halo that graced gamefaqs. I give halo lessons for MS points, msg me.
I hate AA's in both games. But I like Reach's maps more(Yes even with the annoying forge world maps always getting picked) and I certainly like a lot of things about Reach better. Just hate armor lock so much.
I'm still curious to see what the TU does for Halo 4. I like this game a lot but there are annoying flaws that hopefully get fixed. Otherwise this game won't touch Halo 3 or Halo 2 for me.