343 explains why the csr isnt visible ingame

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. 343 explains why the csr isnt visible ingame
3 years ago#11
elitewarrior500 posted...
https://forums.halowaypoint.com/yaf_postsm2211464_BS-Angel-finally-answered-why-CSR-is-not.aspx#post2211464

are you fu***** serious? more catering to casuals go figure


...but *Casuals* make up the majority of gamers. So, if they're catering to them, why would that not make sense? Also...in a few years, I seriously doubt you'll care.
---
www.youtube.com/MensReaEnt
http://www.facebook.com/MensReaEnt
3 years ago#12
URBANLEG3ND posted...
elitewarrior500 posted...
https://forums.halowaypoint.com/yaf_postsm2211464_BS-Angel-finally-answered-why-CSR-is-not.aspx#post2211464

are you fu***** serious? more catering to casuals go figure


...but *Casuals* make up the majority of gamers. So, if they're catering to them, why would that not make sense? Also...in a few years, I seriously doubt you'll care.



Ceph Falco
Recruit - Iron
i honestly dont get why they cant cater to competitive players. if you cater to competitive you make both sides happy. casuals can still play the game just fine and competitive players are happy because the game works for a balanced and even playing field of who is actually better
17 minutes ago
1 thank for this post


not very indepth but brings a point
---
E=mc^(OMG)/wtf
GT: Ceph Falco
3 years ago#13
So, what is the rebuttal to URBANLEG3ND's post?
---
"Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
3 years ago#14
elitewarrior500 posted...
URBANLEG3ND posted...
elitewarrior500 posted...
https://forums.halowaypoint.com/yaf_postsm2211464_BS-Angel-finally-answered-why-CSR-is-not.aspx#post2211464

are you fu***** serious? more catering to casuals go figure


...but *Casuals* make up the majority of gamers. So, if they're catering to them, why would that not make sense? Also...in a few years, I seriously doubt you'll care.



Ceph Falco
Recruit - Iron
i honestly dont get why they cant cater to competitive players. if you cater to competitive you make both sides happy. casuals can still play the game just fine and competitive players are happy because the game works for a balanced and even playing field of who is actually better
17 minutes ago
1 thank for this post


not very indepth but brings a point


Good point. Certainly can't argue with that. It would be nice to see both *sides* happy. Although, I have to admit...I don't ever see that happening. It just gets old seeing competitive players calling casuals worthless, lazy, blah blah blah...and casuals calling competitive players no lifers, or whatever. Why can't we all just play the damn games? Instead, people would rather argue about who is better, etc...when, in a few years, none of the people arguing will care anymore.
---
www.youtube.com/MensReaEnt
http://www.facebook.com/MensReaEnt
3 years ago#15
URBANLEG3ND posted...
Good point. Certainly can't argue with that. It would be nice to see both *sides* happy. Although, I have to admit...I don't ever see that happening. It just gets old seeing competitive players calling casuals worthless, lazy, blah blah blah...and casuals calling competitive players no lifers, or whatever. Why can't we all just play the damn games? Instead, people would rather argue about who is better, etc...when, in a few years, none of the people arguing will care anymore.


Attitudes of players has 0 to do with the game.
3 years ago#16
I love how she still doesn't really answer the question
3 years ago#17
What would happen if this game was catered more towards competitive players? What would change, exactly?
---
"Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
3 years ago#18
items would not be in the game for the sake of having more things in the game

cmon suppressor? storm rifle? both of these are inferior to the AR in every non theoretical situation.
---
"I got lost and a hooker tried to kiss me"
3 years ago#19
Sahduk posted...
items would not be in the game for the sake of having more things in the game

cmon suppressor? storm rifle? both of these are inferior to the AR in every non theoretical situation.


So, it would just be more straightforward? Not much variance?
---
"Opinions should be a result of a thought, not a substitute for it."
3 years ago#20
From: elitewarrior500 | #010
The_Lowlife posted...
Such butthurt TC.


User Name The_Lowlife
User ID 6715906
Board User Level 15: New User (1)
Awarded to users with at least 3 Karma. Can create 5 topics, 50 messages per day. Can delete own messages, close topics.
Account Created Thursday, January 10, 2013 9:47 AM
Last Visit Friday, January 25, 2013 1:34 PM
Signature I'm a lowlife, and I'm loving it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29RnY0H7cj4
Karma 12

What's that supposed to prove, that you can copy and paste someones profile? Maybe you should concentrate on getting some aloe for that butthurt than posting peoples profiles.
---
I'm a Lowlife, and I'm loving it.
http://i.imgur.com/4qwKz.jpg
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. 343 explains why the csr isnt visible ingame

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived