For the majority of this bored, I'd say anything around 1.25-1.5 is average. Anything below that is pretty poor, and anything higher is above average I'd say. Good on the other hand is 2.0+ for most. I'd say anyone who can double their score to death ratio on a consistant basis is good. --- Saying I'm one of the best is just rude. All the people who don't agree look stupid then, and I don't want to make everyone feel stupid. (GT)- GotMyProSocksOn
#42lderivedxPosted 2/9/2013 9:52:00 PM
Anything above average is above average. Imagine that. --- in PvP... the Grammardin is invincible. But in PvM I find the Mathazon to be much stronger... as long as you've maxed out Derivatives.-wing
#43AndaristPosted 2/9/2013 10:05:58 PM
Arguing about how many 50s someone had was way better than this trash topic.
this is like CoD **** here. TC, staaaaaahp. --- a Perfect Rake tier 1: andarist | tier 3: mephy, trav | tier 5: bale. - Vizeroth
#44iFi_SalamanderPosted 2/10/2013 6:03:06 AM
"whats considered a good k/d?"
I only care about fictitious video game numbers because I have nothing in real life worth being proud of.
"I'm at a 3.96 right now."
This is a phony topic for me to brag in.
"Is that any good?"
Because my skill doesn't show on its own, I must point it out myself. I have no one else to be proud of me other than random people on the internet that I've never met. Please be my friend!
"Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead."
I'm a murderer.
I think you are my new favorite poster. --- 3DS FC: 4312-9992-0441