Is this better than Reach?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Is this better than Reach?
3 years ago#21
appleturnover87 posted...
It will be when bravo's done with it


yeah pretty much this
---
OOOH LAWD JESUS OH JESUS GET DA WATER *****! IT GOING DOWN! DEM MOTHER******* BOOTLEG FIREWORK ****! OH ****! wooo
3 years ago#22
DvoloS88 posted...
Iluvurmomwc posted...
It's worth picking up for $20 but no where near $60.


Wow halo 4s not worth 60 bucks... And reach was? Omg people halo 4 is 343 first GAME reach was bungies 4th.? By that comparison 4 is AMAZING


And so what? Halo Wars is the best Halo game because it was their first Halo?

What you said can't even qualify as logic.
---
Underwater Spartans:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Djp5dtz02eQ&feature=plcp
3 years ago#23
Depends on how much you like Shotty Snipes.
---
It's free to play after you buy it. That's F2P genius. ~ Brutal_Felix
3 years ago#24
Absolutely not.
---
MvC3 Mains - Spidey(Y)/Deadpool(B)/Doom(B) | Experimenting: Phoenix(A)/Dante/(Y)/Doom(B)
XBL GT: KageSenshi ------ Chikara - Chie - Yuuki
3 years ago#25
SterlingFox posted...
DvoloS88 posted...
Iluvurmomwc posted...
It's worth picking up for $20 but no where near $60.


Wow halo 4s not worth 60 bucks... And reach was? Omg people halo 4 is 343 first GAME reach was bungies 4th.? By that comparison 4 is AMAZING


And so what? Halo Wars is the best Halo game because it was their first Halo?

What you said can't even qualify as logic.


Ok mr fox lets talk logic, after 5 halos Reach being the fifth under Bungie wtf did they do to innovate the game and change s*** up other than AAs? Not a damn thing, bungie sat there and adopted the CoD syndrome. Now 343 comes along with there first halo title and yes makes mistakes but trys new things and innovate multiplayer. How bout you hop off my balls and go play reach.
3 years ago#26
^Are you talking about Reach vs H3? Because there are more differences between H3 and Reach than just AAs.
---
MvC3 Mains - Spidey(Y)/Deadpool(B)/Doom(B) | Experimenting: Phoenix(A)/Dante/(Y)/Doom(B)
XBL GT: KageSenshi ------ Chikara - Chie - Yuuki
#27
(message deleted)
3 years ago#28
Single player is better than reach

Multiplayer is worse than reach
---
http://www.youtube.com/user/demigodxhero/
http://i330.photobucket.com/albums/l406/n00b11CE/demigodxzero.gif
3 years ago#29
#25 DvoloS88 Posted
Ok mr fox lets talk logic, after 5 halos Reach being the fifth under Bungie wtf did they do to innovate the game and change s*** up other than AAs? Not a damn thing, bungie sat there and adopted the CoD syndrome. Now 343 comes along with there first halo title and yes makes mistakes but trys new things and innovate multiplayer. How bout you hop off my balls and go play reach.

So I just reread this post and caught the bolded part.

Please elaborate on this innovation you're talking about.
---
MvC3 Mains - Spidey(Y)/Deadpool(B)/Doom(B) | Experimenting: Phoenix(A)/Dante/(Y)/Doom(B)
XBL GT: KageSenshi ------ Chikara - Chie - Yuuki
3 years ago#30
lderivedx posted...
From: DvoloS88 | #025
I'm really upset someone demonstrated how stupid my reasoning is.


We can see that.


Wow making up posts with my name under it, you sir need to get a life.
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Is this better than Reach?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived