ToucheAmorePosted 3/14/2013 4:25:35 PM | does response seem somehow more reactive than it already does with a wireless controller?
---
http://i.imgur.com/xjIiBOr.jpg
http://oi53.tinypic.com/28a111e.jpg |
stoltenberg11Posted 3/14/2013 4:43:53 PM | ive always thought so, but my friends tell me im paranoid
---
If death is nothing but a path to be trod,
then walk with me and let me introduce you to your god. |
NoisufSJPosted 3/14/2013 4:53:25 PM | It does, after years of using a wireless controller I borrowed a wired controller from a friend and noticed a difference right away. The reason for this is because since a wired controller is wired directly into the Xbox, there is absolutely zero latency between your action on the controller and the action on the screen. A wired controller has a slight delay. The difference is not big, but you'll notice it if you've used a wireless controller for a long time.
---
This is my sig ya dig? |
RAGEface14Posted 3/14/2013 4:55:10 PM | They have faster response times than wireless.
---
The sight of hell brings its viewers in |
That1GuyyPosted 3/14/2013 7:43:00 PM | The average human does not have the ability to perceive any difference between the two, if there is even a difference to begin with. The difference between the two in latency is not that significant. Truly, the only real advantage to a wired controller is that you won't have the batteries run out during play.
---
Perfection. Where everyone fails.
If you expect nothing you can be happy for everything. |
SunDevil77Posted 3/14/2013 7:50:16 PM | RAGEface14 posted...They have faster response times than wireless. ^ That. But the difference is so minor that it won't matter. Unless you're playing in a large tournament for a prize, where people have the reaction speeds of a damn greek god. --- Breakfast foods can serve many purposes ~Ron Swanson |
Pyronix337Posted 3/14/2013 9:48:54 PM | The difference only matters for PC games where you need to make a series of extremely fast and accurate clicks. And even then it's iffy. Certainly in a game like Halo, the difference is negligible, and probably unnoticable altogether |
RAGEface14Posted 3/14/2013 9:52:28 PM | SunDevil77 posted...RAGEface14 posted...
They have faster response times than wireless.
^ That.
But the difference is so minor that it won't matter. Unless you're playing in a large tournament for a prize, where people have the reaction speeds of a damn greek god. When I use wireless controllers, I get a pretty significant delay. Could just be a synchronization problem between my console and TV, though. --- RAGEface14Expect big words in my posts. |
xoAxeloxPosted 3/14/2013 10:01:43 PM | the response time is negligible unless you have some sort of interference with your wireless transmission while using a wireless controller
the only reason wired controllers are preferred at competitive events is for consistency because wireless transmissions can be disrupted
---
PSN: axeei
XBL GT: axeeeeeeeeL |
ODommPosted 3/14/2013 10:14:38 PM | Tube TV v.s. an HD tv is a way more noticeable difference IMO.
When you can make a tv with the instant feedback of a tube tv with the graphics of an HD tv, I will give you all the money.
---
The mind of the subject will desperately struggle to create memories where none exist...
~~Just give me all the bacon and eggs you have~~ |
Facebook | 
Twitter
