Who created a better Halo? Bungie with Reach, or 343 with Halo 4?

#31That1GuyyPosted 5/8/2013 1:50:36 PM
Reach was awful, but at least it was fixable.

Whether 4 actually gets fixed remains to be seen, but things like hard coded flag mechanics aren't making me feel very confident.
Perfection. Where everyone fails.
If you expect nothing you can be happy for everything.
#32biohazard1775Posted 5/8/2013 2:41:47 PM
Here there will be retribution.
#33xiTz_RyaNx(Topic Creator)Posted 5/8/2013 2:53:31 PM
SterlingFox posted...
xiTz_RyaNx posted...
What do you think needs to be added to Halo 4 to make it more "complete"?

Why do you question anybody who says Halo Reach is better, demanding an explanation, but then let anybody who likes Halo 4 more pass?

Halo 4 is my vote for which was better, so I require to explanation from someone who agrees with me. If you vote for Halo Reach, I want to know why out of curiosity and points proving why your opinion differs. Asking why someone agrees when they already have the same belief as I do is counter productive.
Gamertag - GotMyProSocksOn
What you think is broken with a game could easily be explained with you being terrible at it.
#34marathonplayer1Posted 5/8/2013 7:57:19 PM
reach is way better! IT HAS FIREFIGHT!!!!!
Sir, the Orks are invading!
Just keep throwing guardsmen at the problem, until it goes away.
#35COG_KillaPosted 5/8/2013 8:31:16 PM
I didn't think it'd be this close
When i'm alone I strip, cover myself with Vaseline, lay in my neighbor's garden and pretend I am a slug.
#36ledfan90Posted 5/8/2013 9:10:45 PM
Reach because of invasion. If halo 4 had invasion it would probably be a boltshot campfest