Who created a better Halo? Bungie with Reach, or 343 with Halo 4?

#31That1GuyyPosted 5/8/2013 1:50:36 PM
Reach was awful, but at least it was fixable.

Whether 4 actually gets fixed remains to be seen, but things like hard coded flag mechanics aren't making me feel very confident.
---
Perfection. Where everyone fails.
If you expect nothing you can be happy for everything.
#32biohazard1775Posted 5/8/2013 2:41:47 PM
Reach
---
http://i.imgur.com/s4M4rL6.gif
Here there will be retribution.
#33xiTz_RyaNx(Topic Creator)Posted 5/8/2013 2:53:31 PM
SterlingFox posted...
xiTz_RyaNx posted...
What do you think needs to be added to Halo 4 to make it more "complete"?


Why do you question anybody who says Halo Reach is better, demanding an explanation, but then let anybody who likes Halo 4 more pass?


Halo 4 is my vote for which was better, so I require to explanation from someone who agrees with me. If you vote for Halo Reach, I want to know why out of curiosity and points proving why your opinion differs. Asking why someone agrees when they already have the same belief as I do is counter productive.
---
Gamertag - GotMyProSocksOn
What you think is broken with a game could easily be explained with you being terrible at it.
#34marathonplayer1Posted 5/8/2013 7:57:19 PM
reach is way better! IT HAS FIREFIGHT!!!!!
---
Sir, the Orks are invading!
Just keep throwing guardsmen at the problem, until it goes away.
#35COG_KillaPosted 5/8/2013 8:31:16 PM
I didn't think it'd be this close
---
When i'm alone I strip, cover myself with Vaseline, lay in my neighbor's garden and pretend I am a slug.
#36ledfan90Posted 5/8/2013 9:10:45 PM
Reach because of invasion. If halo 4 had invasion it would probably be a boltshot campfest