Smasher10 posted...I'm sorry and I'm sure you will have some sarcastic and brilliant wit response to this and feel as though you are the superior of this little skermish
Oh buddy. If you're going to try to pull the high horse card you're gonna have to proofread. So close.
but I feel arguing silly little opinions and just how we responded differently to things in Zelda games is quite a waste of time.
Yes, unlike the otherwise vital discussions taking place on this board.
I will never get it when people dismiss anything on a Gamefaqs forum as being insignificant. Of
course it's insignificant. That's what makes it fun. Arguing like this about things people actually have a stake in would only hurt feelings.
Refuting what we've been talking about is silly as they are little things that neither one of us will ever "prove" to the other as they are both "baseless speculation" and opinion from both ends.
Again, my issue isn't with your opinions, but your evidence behind them. The plot of the game was made for the controller? Show me evidence. Zelda apologizes at the end of OoT for manipulating Link? Show me evidence.
You present things as factually true without any basis in evidence. Which is why I'm calling it baseless speculation. Opposing viewpoints are all well and good, but you're at best factually mistaken and at worst lying. As always I assume the former.
And I like discussing things about the games and silly little jokes (normally, the witty sarcasm you have shown in this topic would crack me right up, however in the context of this topic, it just seems pompous and pretentious).
Whoa, slow down, I'm pompous AND pretentious?
That hurts. That hurts and stings and burns and smarts and...let's look at our thesaurus to see if I've missed any...damages? Mars? Pricks?
Punctures?
---
King of the Zelda Wii U WT Boardhttp://i.imgur.com/RK6EB.png