your reaction if R* reveals San Fierro & Las Venturas are in the game?

#11NakedSnake1986Posted 5/26/2013 8:40:18 AM
Las Venturas was such a huge letdown in San Andreas. Any casino you could enter was just the bottom floor and it was all copy paste design. The only redeeming part of that city was the hidden casino heist mission you got when either killing or banging your las Venturas girlfriend who worked at the casino.

San Ferrio was done well as condensed as it was and so was Los Santos.
---
Tied to a wheel, fingers got to feel,
Bleeding through a tourniquet smile
#12NakedSnake1986Posted 5/26/2013 8:40:30 AM
Las Venturas was such a huge letdown in San Andreas. Any casino you could enter was just the bottom floor and it was all copy paste design. The only redeeming part of that city was the hidden casino heist mission you got when either killing or banging your las Venturas girlfriend who worked at the casino.

San Ferrio was done well as condensed as it was and so was Los Santos.
---
Tied to a wheel, fingers got to feel,
Bleeding through a tourniquet smile
#13B0vrilPosted 5/26/2013 9:16:02 AM
Why would you hope for it? You're only setting yourself up for disappointment.

I don't get why people are so obsessed with having two more cities crammed in. San Andreas' biggest fault was that it had 3 cities.


_Moron_ posted...
I don't wanna sound like a moron (pun intended) but don't you think the revealed LS map was a bit too small?


You do realize that what we've seen of the map thus far is only a part of it?

http://media.gtanet.com/images/7151.jpg

The city(or what can see of it) may look small, but that's a combination of it being densely packed & the low resolution of the image. Most of the roads you can make out are four lanes wide, alot of the smaller roads are lost at that resolution.

I'd imagine you could pack most of Liberty City in.
#14_Moron_(Topic Creator)Posted 5/26/2013 6:59:06 PM
Why would you hope for it? You're only setting yourself up for disappointment.

no, I would be setting myself up for disappointment if I was expecting it.

hope and expect are not exactly similar my friend (not that you are).
---
"It's better to burn out...than to fa(starts to spin)de away".
-The Kurgan
#15MrcTOtheJPosted 5/26/2013 7:19:58 PM
NakedSnake1986 posted...
Las Venturas was such a huge letdown in San Andreas. Any casino you could enter was just the bottom floor and it was all copy paste design. The only redeeming part of that city was the hidden casino heist mission you got when either killing or banging your las Venturas girlfriend who worked at the casino.

San Ferrio was done well as condensed as it was and so was Los Santos.


Hidden?

How was it hidden, it was full on explained in the mission you get that GF you were dating her because she had the key card for the heist lol. Hidden would be if it just happened with no explanation.

That said, yeah LV wasn't too good but I allways liked it more than San Fierro IMO.

As for my reaction, dunno if they can do all three cities and keep them all fresh and well done, then why not? Personally I don't care if SF makes it in, IMO it'd fit better in it's own game, but LV fits the whole heists vibe to a Tee, and would look amazing in HD with all the lights, and done as well as it could be.

That said I'm more than fine with only Los Santos and the surronding area, seeing as it's an all new map, it should have more than enough to offer with just LS.
---
Currently Playing: Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen, Skyrim, Max Payne 3,
Currently waiting for: GTAV, LR:FFXIII, Grid 2, Gran Turismo 6
#16CADE FOSTERPosted 5/26/2013 8:57:45 PM
san fierro and las venturas will be dlc watch
#17NutralguyPosted 5/26/2013 8:59:07 PM
NakedSnake1986 posted...
Las Venturas was such a huge letdown in San Andreas. Any casino you could enter was just the bottom floor and it was all copy paste design. The only redeeming part of that city was the hidden casino heist mission you got when either killing or banging your las Venturas girlfriend who worked at the casino.

San Ferrio was done well as condensed as it was and so was Los Santos.


San Fierro was the most boring part of San Andreas. You gotta remember, they didn't capture the Las Vegas soul in that fictional Venturas. They just did what most people THINK Las Vegas is, just the strip, old downtown, and some houses around it. Our airport is a southern thing, not western. And we have areas worth seeing besides the city. Vegas born and raised.
---
I sit at a point in my life where my last string of sanity has to be tied to my middle finger.
#18namewitheldPosted 5/26/2013 8:59:28 PM
I already played SA for like 200 hours. Im seemingly the only person dissapointed that theyre reusing locals though.
#19PHOENIXZEROPosted 5/26/2013 10:06:13 PM
Hypotheticals are boring when you know already know it isn't happening, Rockstar is already on record stating LS is the only major city.

Nutralguy posted...


San Fierro was the most boring part of San Andreas. You gotta remember, they didn't capture the Las Vegas soul in that fictional Venturas. They just did what most people THINK Las Vegas is, just the strip, old downtown, and some houses around it. Our airport is a southern thing, not western. And we have areas worth seeing besides the city. Vegas born and raised.


SF was the most fun city to drive fast through thanks to the hills. <_< LS and LV were mostly flat just like their RL counterparts.
---
Band/Artist I've been listening to way too much: Fallon Bowman/Amphibious Assault.
https://soundcloud.com/fallonbowman
#20LordPonchoPosted 5/27/2013 12:23:33 AM
With technology today, I would rather have Las Venturas be on it's own.
---
"lol der was a shdow on my carpet but ti looked like a stane and tried to clen it up but ti was a shadoow" -Ghost4800