I think that one needs to go back to the drawing board. Are we really going to ignore my Rugrats idea?
How bout CFA? Cybertron's Fallen Alliance.
Wow, someone doesn't know their acronyms. Legends United=LU. Where did you get Lou from? Wow, someone needs to go back to school(Hint: It's you Clunk) --- "Since one must take sides, one might as well choose the side that is victorious, the side which devastates, loots, and burns."--Napoleon.
This is simply EO vs EO. I don't see any point in taking it seriously, how is it any different to a common EO private match, in which LU has fought in many times? The only difference I can see is the name LU. We've done countless EO private matches and they've always been fun. This weekend I'm focusing on setting up a clan battle with MoD and hosting AB vs Dolphinboy200. --- EO leader, 100% legit PSN~ numpteez, DMG_BattleSeeker.
This would be great battle, but it will never happen. Reason 1: Yuggle will be a no show. Reason 2: Numpteez doesn't want to lose so he will keep declining your attempts.
IMO, NOD would've beaten EO anyway, with or without Swb, but I guess they didn't have the guts, bolts, or brains to go through with it. Shame on Gears and MGDiesel!
Nobody wants to lose lol. That's not the reason why I think it's pointless. I've never gone negative in a clan battle anyway so I wouldn't against them. And dude, the nation of domination lost to MoD in a clan battle. Yet EO always destroys MoD. There's the logic. --- EO leader, 100% legit PSN~ numpteez, DMG_BattleSeeker.
I didn't say you would go negative, I said you're afraid to lose and you are. About going negative, if you've ever lost a 1v1, and we all know you have, then you have went negative before. It's simple math. We have all played the Friedens and just like most clans, they only have two good players. Now I'll go back to watching you avoid fighting Swb's new clan, because this is a battle that we know won't happen! So you and Lm187 can get on your knees and beg Yuggle and Swb to come back! hahaha