Yes, at least two more move choices would be preferable
3.85% (6 votes)
Yes, we need more than 6 moves though
5.77% (9 votes)
It is perfect as is.
30.13% (47 votes)
We really need more than 10 poll options. wtf gamefaqs
13.46% (21 votes)
This poll is now closed.
I think it's an interesting question. Probably done before, but whatevs. --- http://i.imgur.com/D0LCF.png http://i.imgur.com/imGUn.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ePGHn.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ObpkK.png
#2YaRlyJoePosted 11/17/2012 6:24:08 PM
It would be a complete cluster**** --- http://i.imgur.com/LWtaf.jpg
#3HeyWheresKelPosted 11/17/2012 6:24:58 PM
I've already met my "Oh look, it's this topic" quota for the day. Someone else has to do it. --- "I see the way you look at him. I'm a man too, ya know? I go pee pee standing up!"
#4Natwaf_akidnaPosted 11/17/2012 6:25:12 PM
If there's an HM only slot, sure. --- My Little Phineas and Ferb: Summer is Magic! Aww, I lost to SuperNiceDog, Winner of the Rivalry Rumble Guru Contest
#5electric_emuPosted 11/17/2012 6:27:18 PM
Ehhhh, I am torn. Five moves would be cool, but I think the game is nicely balanced with just four.
#6YaRlyJoePosted 11/17/2012 6:34:21 PM
If there's an HM only slot, sure.
This is a good idea. HM/non battle move slot --- http://i.imgur.com/LWtaf.jpg
#7FungusForBrainsPosted 11/17/2012 6:37:58 PM
The game is pretty balanced with four as is, but I voted for the "it will add more strategy" option. Because even though it's giving sweepers more options to sweep with, it would give tanks/walls/stallers more options to wall said sweepers with. Frankly, I don't see a reason why it shouldn't be implemented, tradition notwithstanding.
#8amuseingPosted 11/17/2012 8:08:19 PM
My real answer is one more moveslot, but of course I answered for more poll options. Unlike moves, you can never have too many lol. --- Non-Flammable? Challenge Accepted.