I actually agree with this. It's part of the reason I find it hard to get into anything past Gold/Silver in terms of Pokemon. I love the games, I just don't give a **** about the Pokemon. To this day, about 90% of my favorites are Gen 1.
The first generation had creativity and intelligent design. With each generation, it seemed more focused on animal puns than interesting and original Pokemon.
This coming from the guy who's namesake appeared in 4th Gen...
Victini, Sneasel, as well as almost all of 3rd Gen's Pokemon would all like to have a word with you. Ralts and Kirlia, especially, for the way you betrayed your pre-evolutions. --- Legendary Pokemon: Breaking balls in their sleep since 1998. Official Shiny Victini of the Pokemon B/W 2 and PMD: GTI boards.
I sort of agree with you, the 4th had a few good ones and i just didnt like the 5th, BUT the 2nd gen was better because it had more memorable pokemon and the third is Actually pretty good too, in my opinion its 2nd then 1st then 3rd then 4th then 5th
I disagree with TC. I take as much delight from lots of Pokemon from other Gens as I have from Pokemon in Gen 1. And it's worth noting that I've been playing Pokemon since 1999. --- http://johnfenzel.typepad.com/john_fenzels_blog/images/checkmate.jpg
Why post at all if you are going to respond that way? It does not further the conversation in any way other than to take up space.
The thing is, even if the post is well thought out, it's just copypasta. It's evident by the fact he doesn't even mention Gen 5. --- Can I put my Onix in your Cloyster? Yes: 4 No: 4 Maybe: 2 The Sapphire Carbuncle: Why I'm proud to be a brony http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyYTKbC6tbw