This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Would it actually upset you if the gen 6 fire starter ends up fire/fighting?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon Black Version 2
  3. Would it actually upset you if the gen 6 fire starter ends up fire/fighting?
3 years ago#51
I don't care either way. Gen 4 was bad, and 5 was a complete bust. As far as I'm concerned, Pokemon is dead.
---
Evelynn is my waifu.
Help... Me...
3 years ago#52
MizunoRyuu posted...
I don't care either way. Gen 4 was bad, and 5 was a complete bust. As far as I'm concerned, Pokemon is dead.


Then what are you doing here?
3 years ago#53
I would be a little irritated, but then again, I rarely keep my starters around anyway. I usually replace them with pokemon that I enjoy using more.

It would just be another reason to go with the water or grass starters. Either way, I would rather see a Fire/Electric or something. (This would not be the first time that a starter would get a second type that counters the starter it is usually weak against if this happened)
3 years ago#54
Lord_Draco170 posted...
I would be a little irritated, but then again, I rarely keep my starters around anyway. I usually replace them with pokemon that I enjoy using more.

It would just be another reason to go with the water or grass starters. Either way, I would rather see a Fire/Electric or something. (This would not be the first time that a starter would get a second type that counters the starter it is usually weak against if this happened)


But then the water starter would need a secondary ice type
Water/Ice and the grass would be grass/ground
---
Rocket Professor Al ~ R ~ Support Elesa! Rocket take over world!
3 years ago#55
It wouldn't be THAT bad for me - it's tolerable. However, strategically, it's a pain to end up dealing with an additional two weaknesses (Flying, Psychic), while being only given a sparse set of Fighting moves, which, while able to take out four types (Normal, Ice, Rock, Steel), are so sparse and usually so weak as to be negligible.
---
Every wound a new opportunity, every curse a new challenge.
I shall encounter defeats... But I will not be defeated.
3 years ago#56
I wouldn't be upset, per se. I'd probably be whacking my head off a wall, though, yelling, "WHY! IS! GF! SO! ANNOYING!"

Yes, Fire/Fighting types are old as the hills. Blaziken was awesome. Infernape was okay. Emboar was bland after three generations of a row of Fire/Fighting type starters.
---
Pokemon SoulSilver FC: 1335 1407 6427
When Life gives you lemons, throw them back and demand cookies instead! -Official Sandslash of the PMD3 boards
3 years ago#57
Upset? Not really.

Mildly annoy and make me wonder why they're so stuck on Fire / Fighting for starters? Yes.
---
~ Master of Electricity ~
Electro: 0518-6613-7620 - Pokemon White
3 years ago#58
I just want a decently designed one, emboar was dreadful. If it looks as cool as infernape I have zero problems with it
3 years ago#59
I'd be more annoyed, the Fire/Fighting thing has really run its course now....
---
It's Only Impossible If You Stop To Think About It
3 years ago#60
As long as it looks cool. We haven't had a cool looking fire type since Typhlosion. (Maybe Blazikien)
---
:D.... :/.... D:... D':
  1. Boards
  2. Pokemon Black Version 2
  3. Would it actually upset you if the gen 6 fire starter ends up fire/fighting?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived