Actually Chocobo what would have been pretty awesome would be- Big Daddy Versus Sweet tooth (if they were willing to get a bit dark) due to Sweet Tooth threatening the little sister, Kratos versus Evil Cole (Kratos could mistake him for an incarnation of Zeus due to the lightning and his power, and Evil Cole would want to take Kratos's power by killing him), and Fat Princess and Sackboy (dunno, but theyre both cutesy, and would feel like it'd fit btter)
That's good as well. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/EmperorLawlight.png
Scare/kill civilians and keep food for your self or selflessly share it with everyone.
Guess which one evil Cole picked.
That's not greed - that's being selfish. Not the same thing as the desire to possess things. One could argue that it's the sensible thing to do.
I guess there's truth to that. Alright then, both Fat Princess and Evil Cole are selfish.
A bit weak but I guess that's bound to happen to characters that provide padding.
Most of the rivalries are weak, especially Kratos and Sweet Tooth (Sweet Tooth and Fat Princess would have made much more sense). It's still better than no rivalries at all, which is what Smash offered.
You say that like its a bad thing. Its not like rivalries are a necessity in a game like smash. The rivalries weren't in your face bit they are obviously there. I'd rather have rivalries downplayed then rivalries that are nonsensical tbh. With this games roster they really should not have stressed the concept of rivalries and left it up to imagination. Now instead of people going "who would be this characters rival?" We get "let's attempt to make the rivalries make sense."