Would this game have been better as a traditional fighter or a Smash Bros clone?

#1Nath1343Posted 5/4/2013 6:03:33 AM
Would this game have been better as a traditional fighter or a Smash Bros clone? - Results (55 votes)
Traditional Fighter
10.91% (6 votes)
Super Smash Bros clone
32.73% (18 votes)
Neither - the game's style is fine as it is
54.55% (30 votes)
Other (comment)
1.82% (1 votes)
This poll is now closed.
I thought PlayStation All-Stars ended up being a mash-up of the traditional fighter and the party/fighting mascot brawler which is Super Smash Bros so I was just curious as to whether you guys were happy with how the game's style turned out or whether you would have preferred something different.

Personally, I think the concept that Superbot went with was cool but poorly executed in the end. Would like to have seen it as a traditional fighting game though.
PSN: nath1343
Isaac, Shulk, Toad and Pac-Man for Super Smash Bros 4!
#2AlmehoPosted 5/4/2013 6:15:34 AM
I'm fine with the way the game is. Glitches and all.
#3AlmehoPosted 5/4/2013 6:16:13 AM
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
#4ButKevinBaconPosted 5/4/2013 6:33:43 AM
Power Stone clone.
#5wwinterj25Posted 5/4/2013 6:52:20 AM
If this was a traditional fighter I doubt I'd have bought it. Not my type of games. At least the way this game is fits into a small market. What I mean is there isn't many games like it where as there are quite a lot of traditional fighters. I'm fine with the game how it is.
One who knows nothing can understand nothing - GamerTag: wwinterj/PSN wwinterj
#6diebuster2Posted 5/4/2013 7:30:03 AM(edited)
ButKevinBacon posted...
Power Stone clone.

Civil discussion on GameFAQS? AIN'T NOBODY GOT TIME FOR THAT!
#7ZavalsBizPosted 5/4/2013 7:52:27 AM
If this was like Smash, Kratos would always win.
#8PHEEliNUXPosted 5/4/2013 10:57:29 AM

BB and TTT2 are the only "traditional" fighters i like

And 1 SSB Per gen is enough for me, I don't want a Sony clone
"Lesser Demon is less than a Demon, But more than an Imp"