Already seeing inappropriate emblems

#201cedieboldPosted 11/14/2012 12:38:05 PM
What have we learned?

-BDSMKane apparently thinks child pornography is okay because we should all just get past the imagery. Anyone who is offended by it is ruining this country.

-Anyone who defends the right to make wangs and scrotums their emblems are making up for their small wangs and/or like and want to feel wangs inside them, and/or are not mature enough to just make something else; instead fixating on that.

-The majority of the users on this forum do not actually read the TOS before they check the "I Agree" box so they do not know that they've agreed NOT to draw little wangs and naked women as emblems. This says either a) they don't know how to read or b) they're ignorant enough to agree to contracts without reading/comprehending them.
---
PSN - DuckySolo
Playing: WWE 13 / On-Deck: COD:BLOPS2
#202MahoganyTooth92Posted 11/14/2012 12:39:36 PM
EVE6 FAN posted...
I just dont believe you, honestly. I dont see how a grown ass man can get so distracted that it "pulls me out of the game" when you see a cartoon dick, so much so in fact that you take the time to report the person. I bet you probably message the person telling them you did it, too.


No, I do not message the person I report, it's not worth my time.
---
The state of the pokemon board...
http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/5583/thestateofthepokemonboa.png
#203EVE6 FANPosted 11/14/2012 12:39:50 PM
EyeDrinkBeer posted...
Complaining about animated genitals that someone created on COD, that's literally on the screen for a second...

I would love to see how you guys react when someone spray paints photos of d*cks on the walls in TF2.

Or when Will Farrell T-Bags a drum set in Step Brothers.

I'm sure every person you ban will turn over a new leaf and create an alt account with acceptable material filled with rainbows and cupcakes...

Never mind, rainbows are offensive.


So true. I havent played TF2, but i did play TFC and people were constantly spray painting graphic sexual IMAGES, not even cartoons.
---
PsN: Ultraviolence (L in violence is a cap i)
#204EVE6 FANPosted 11/14/2012 12:41:18 PM
cediebold posted...
What have we learned?

-BDSMKane apparently thinks child pornography is okay because we should all just get past the imagery. Anyone who is offended by it is ruining this country.

-Anyone who defends the right to make wangs and scrotums their emblems are making up for their small wangs and/or like and want to feel wangs inside them, and/or are not mature enough to just make something else; instead fixating on that.

-The majority of the users on this forum do not actually read the TOS before they check the "I Agree" box so they do not know that they've agreed NOT to draw little wangs and naked women as emblems. This says either a) they don't know how to read or b) they're ignorant enough to agree to contracts without reading/comprehending them.


Right, because everyone reads the TOS.

Im sure everyone has agreed to some kind of TOS in the past and done things they asked you not to.

And who said anything about child porn? I must've missed that one.
---
PsN: Ultraviolence (L in violence is a cap i)
#205EyeDrinkBeerPosted 11/14/2012 12:42:59 PM
EVE6 FAN posted...
EyeDrinkBeer posted...
Complaining about animated genitals that someone created on COD, that's literally on the screen for a second...

I would love to see how you guys react when someone spray paints photos of d*cks on the walls in TF2.

Or when Will Farrell T-Bags a drum set in Step Brothers.

I'm sure every person you ban will turn over a new leaf and create an alt account with acceptable material filled with rainbows and cupcakes...

Never mind, rainbows are offensive.


So true. I havent played TF2, but i did play TFC and people were constantly spray painting graphic sexual IMAGES, not even cartoons.


Yep, same thing in TF2, and some people have even managed to use .gif's!

Puts COD porn to shame.
---
BattleLog: EyeDrinK
#206MahoganyTooth92Posted 11/14/2012 12:43:13 PM
EVE6 FAN posted...
cediebold posted...
What have we learned?

-BDSMKane apparently thinks child pornography is okay because we should all just get past the imagery. Anyone who is offended by it is ruining this country.

-Anyone who defends the right to make wangs and scrotums their emblems are making up for their small wangs and/or like and want to feel wangs inside them, and/or are not mature enough to just make something else; instead fixating on that.

-The majority of the users on this forum do not actually read the TOS before they check the "I Agree" box so they do not know that they've agreed NOT to draw little wangs and naked women as emblems. This says either a) they don't know how to read or b) they're ignorant enough to agree to contracts without reading/comprehending them.


Right, because everyone reads the TOS.

Im sure everyone has agreed to some kind of TOS in the past and done things they asked you not to.


That excuses you from the TOS somehow? Just because you didn't read it?!
Some people.....
---
The state of the pokemon board...
http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/5583/thestateofthepokemonboa.png
#207cedieboldPosted 11/14/2012 12:44:07 PM
btw, Eve 6 is an awful band and you should be ashamed.
---
PSN - DuckySolo
Playing: WWE 13 / On-Deck: COD:BLOPS2
#208EVE6 FANPosted 11/14/2012 12:46:17 PM
MahoganyTooth92 posted...
EVE6 FAN posted...
cediebold posted...
What have we learned?

-BDSMKane apparently thinks child pornography is okay because we should all just get past the imagery. Anyone who is offended by it is ruining this country.

-Anyone who defends the right to make wangs and scrotums their emblems are making up for their small wangs and/or like and want to feel wangs inside them, and/or are not mature enough to just make something else; instead fixating on that.

-The majority of the users on this forum do not actually read the TOS before they check the "I Agree" box so they do not know that they've agreed NOT to draw little wangs and naked women as emblems. This says either a) they don't know how to read or b) they're ignorant enough to agree to contracts without reading/comprehending them.


Right, because everyone reads the TOS.

Im sure everyone has agreed to some kind of TOS in the past and done things they asked you not to.


That excuses you from the TOS somehow? Just because you didn't read it?!
Some people.....


I never said it excused anything. But im willing to bet everyone with a computer has not read every TOS that's been put in front of them and probably has violated more than one.

As for Eve 6, you're probably right but i've never listened to them. Someone gave me this account a couple of years back and i just took it because of the karma and my previous account got banned.
---
PsN: Ultraviolence (L in violence is a cap i)
#209cedieboldPosted 11/14/2012 12:48:36 PM
EVE6 FAN posted...
MahoganyTooth92 posted...
EVE6 FAN posted...
cediebold posted...
What have we learned?

-BDSMKane apparently thinks child pornography is okay because we should all just get past the imagery. Anyone who is offended by it is ruining this country.

-Anyone who defends the right to make wangs and scrotums their emblems are making up for their small wangs and/or like and want to feel wangs inside them, and/or are not mature enough to just make something else; instead fixating on that.

-The majority of the users on this forum do not actually read the TOS before they check the "I Agree" box so they do not know that they've agreed NOT to draw little wangs and naked women as emblems. This says either a) they don't know how to read or b) they're ignorant enough to agree to contracts without reading/comprehending them.


Right, because everyone reads the TOS.

Im sure everyone has agreed to some kind of TOS in the past and done things they asked you not to.


That excuses you from the TOS somehow? Just because you didn't read it?!
Some people.....



As for Eve 6, you're probably right but i've never listened to them. Someone gave me this account a couple of years back and i just took it because of the karma and my previous account got banned.


^ That's a violation of GameFAQ's TOS ... lol, you have 0 credibility, chief.
---
PSN - DuckySolo
Playing: WWE 13 / On-Deck: COD:BLOPS2
#210BDSMKanePosted 11/14/2012 12:49:53 PM
cediebold posted...
What have we learned?...


You do realize that I could actually report you for that post, right? I don't know if it was intentional, but your post shows that you apparently aren't aware of the ToU for GameFAQ's, or simply don't care. A bit of hypocrisy there, if you didn't do it intentionally for sarcastic purposes.

Also, just for future reference:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/features/tou.html
http://www.gamefaqs.com/features/board_etiquette.html
---
"Among creatures born into chaos, a majority will imagine an order, a minority will question the order, and the rest will be pronounced insane."