greatmario3Posted 11/19/2012 10:04:12 AM | Wouldn't it be VERY hard to have a good game? You would never face someone that is at a connection disadvantage. Everyone can kill you in 3 bullets, so you would always instantly die if you got shot first. (unless they have terrible aiming)
I suppose that most of you would be totally fine with getting killed after being shot first, but that would make your K/D ratio go way down and earning score streaks much more difficult.
I have come to accept lag comp, because, for me, its a 50/50 chance that I will have the jump on people even after being shot first, or me shooting some guy 10 times only for him to turn around and kill me in 2 hits.
Just my opinion.
---
PSN ID: Dominic935
"They look like monsters to you?" - Vincent |
Tom344Posted 11/19/2012 10:04:48 AM | That's why you play in a way that puts YOU at an advantage.
---
PSN: TomW344 |
LuxierePosted 11/19/2012 10:05:01 AM | Yeah, screw fairness right?
---
"Embrace your dreams. And, whatever happens, protect your balls" |
greatmario3 (Topic Creator) Posted 11/19/2012 10:08:00 AM | Luxiere posted...Yeah, screw fairness right? Admit it, getting score streaks would be so much more difficult in a lag free game. --- PSN ID: Dominic935 "They look like monsters to you?" - Vincent |
Tom344Posted 11/19/2012 10:08:46 AM | greatmario3 posted...Luxiere posted...
Yeah, screw fairness right?
Admit it, getting score streaks would be so much more difficult in a lag free game. Not if you place yourself in a position you'll always get the first shot on someone. --- PSN: TomW344 |
greatmario3 (Topic Creator) Posted 11/19/2012 10:15:40 AM | Tom344 posted...greatmario3 posted...
Luxiere posted...
Yeah, screw fairness right?
Admit it, getting score streaks would be so much more difficult in a lag free game.
Not if you place yourself in a position you'll always get the first shot on someone. Perhaps that would work, but spawning in this game is a bit iffy, so your position could get compromised pretty quickly. Additionally, have any of you guys ever seen K9 Unit killstreak not from a care package? or even from a care package? I have yet to see dogs in this game, and that is excellent for me cause they destroyed in Black Ops. --- PSN ID: Dominic935 "They look like monsters to you?" - Vincent |
Tom344Posted 11/19/2012 10:17:50 AM | greatmario3 posted...Tom344 posted...
greatmario3 posted...
Luxiere posted...
Yeah, screw fairness right?
Admit it, getting score streaks would be so much more difficult in a lag free game.
Not if you place yourself in a position you'll always get the first shot on someone.
Perhaps that would work, but spawning in this game is a bit iffy, so your position could get compromised pretty quickly.
Additionally, have any of you guys ever seen K9 Unit killstreak not from a care package? or even from a care package?
I have yet to see dogs in this game, and that is excellent for me cause they destroyed in Black Ops. I've seen it in a care pack, yeah. I agree with you on the spawning, on MW3 terminal I completely controlled A and C flags on domination, got a moab and then my teammates run into their spawn, switching the enemy team to behind me. Needless to say, I turned a corner to see 5 people. :C --- PSN: TomW344 |
LuxierePosted 11/19/2012 10:18:05 AM | Yep, some dude got Dogs in a care package on the enemy team yesterday.
And no, I'd take getting pwned legitimately over some crappy lag any day.
---
"Embrace your dreams. And, whatever happens, protect your balls" |
greatmario3 (Topic Creator) Posted 11/19/2012 10:26:22 AM | So from the responses I have gotten, it's safe to say that a lag free game would be much more preferable for everyone.
It would take more skill to earn scorestreaks, as a death would come quickly if you are exposed. Running and gunning would be slightly more challenging.
You may even see more/less camping if the game was lag free.
The fairness factor is absent when lag is present, which I have to say is an irrefutable argument.
But WITH lag comp, even if you are in a good position and fire off the first rounds, you can still get easily killed in 2 hits.
A lot of people would have a 1 K/D because an even kills to death ratio means it was a fair game?
---
PSN ID: Dominic935
"They look like monsters to you?" - Vincent |
Tom344Posted 11/19/2012 10:29:51 AM | greatmario3 posted...So from the responses I have gotten, it's safe to say that a lag free game would be much more preferable for everyone.
It would take more skill to earn scorestreaks, as a death would come quickly if you are exposed. Running and gunning would be slightly more challenging.
You may even see more/less camping if the game was lag free.
The fairness factor is absent when lag is present, which I have to say is an irrefutable argument.
But WITH lag comp, even if you are in a good position and fire off the first rounds, you can still get easily killed in 2 hits.
A lot of people would have a 1 K/D because an even kills to death ratio means it was a fair game? Of course it'd be better, you'd see people playing who actually think. --- PSN: TomW344 |
Facebook | 
Twitter
