"I have a negative k/d because I play the objective"

Back To: Board List | Topic List | Topic Archived
Page 1 of 14 | Next | Last
Hiruseki
Posted 1/19/2013 3:30:30 AM
No. You have a negative k/d because you're bad.
Weiland101
Posted 1/19/2013 3:34:13 AM
"Hi there, I am the typical COD player. I give all the players of this game a bad name because I take this stuff very seriously and my online stats matter in real life because my K/D inspires respect amongst my friends. When I say friends i mean PSN friends because all of my real life friends have told me to f*** off a long time ago"
AmokBSN
Posted 1/19/2013 3:35:27 AM
I'm sure I'm at around 1.7 in terms of KD (before your little bash hammer shows itself) and I would much rather have someone who is even or under in terms of KD if they prevent the team from capping or actually throw themselves forward to capture.

There's a fine line between this of course, mindlessly running forward and heading straight to B is pretty stupid, if they can get a few kills before capturing then thats the best time to get any objective.
---
PSN - AmokBSN
supertomato_13
Posted 1/19/2013 3:39:43 AM
no u
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvss-oshZ74
Hiruseki
(Topic Creator)
Posted 1/19/2013 3:40:59 AM
Weiland101 posted...
"Hi there, I am the typical COD player. I give all the players of this game a bad name because I take this stuff very seriously and my online stats matter in real life because my K/D inspires respect amongst my friends. When I say friends i mean PSN friends because all of my real life friends have told me to f*** off a long time ago"


Nice try. I'm tired of scrubs using "I play for fun" or "I play the objective" as their arguments when they are just plain bad. Why not admit it? I'm bad at other games and I have no problem admitting this. And yeah, I care so much about stats, I play League and join my friends sessions, knowing that there are most likely Lodestars and Blackbirds. Please, try harder.
Weiland101
Posted 1/19/2013 3:47:19 AM
Hiruseki posted...
Weiland101 posted...
"Hi there, I am the typical COD player. I give all the players of this game a bad name because I take this stuff very seriously and my online stats matter in real life because my K/D inspires respect amongst my friends. When I say friends i mean PSN friends because all of my real life friends have told me to f*** off a long time ago"


Nice try. I'm tired of scrubs using "I play for fun" or "I play the objective" as their arguments when they are just plain bad. Why not admit it? I'm bad at other games and I have no problem admitting this. And yeah, I care so much about stats, I play League and join my friends sessions, knowing that there are most likely Lodestars and Blackbirds. Please, try harder.


No, you are trying hard enough for the both of us brother.
Asylum_71
Posted 1/19/2013 3:48:39 AM
From: AmokBSN | #003
I would much rather have someone who is even or under in terms of KD if they prevent the team from capping or actually throw themselves forward to capture.

You do realize that people with negative kds spend most of their time dying, right..? Who exactly are they preventing from capping?
---
if activision were a physical entity, i'd wrap my hands around its neck and have an orgasm as i feel its pulse slow down" - mega boie715
HunteristheGame
Posted 1/19/2013 4:17:38 AM
I've maintained between a 1.5-2.0 K/D in previous CODs but this COD is hot garbage.
I struggle to keep it above 1.2-1.4 because of all the issues this game has.
They did more wrong with it then right. So in this COD I would say if you have below 1.0 (that isn't negative, negative isn't possible) you probably are average and suffer from the games bad coding and lag.
Blops 2 lags more then any other COD by a long shot. Not to mention the massive ammount of glitchers/hackers.
Spetsnaz420
Posted 1/19/2013 4:26:08 AM
Asylum_71 posted...
From: AmokBSN | #003
I would much rather have someone who is even or under in terms of KD if they prevent the team from capping or actually throw themselves forward to capture.

You do realize that people with negative kds spend most of their time dying, right..? Who exactly are they preventing from capping?


There is so much wrong with this I don't know where to begin...

Ok the obvious. Below 1.0 KDR only means you kill less than you die and in no way means you "spend most of your time dying". I'll take a team of below 1.0 KDRs that focus on objectives any day over the KDR whores that simply play TDM on objective modes.

My old DOD clan used to tear up clan matches on a regular basis and most of the first draft players regularly ended matches with lower than 1.0 KDR. Only myself and 2 others would finish with really high KDRs because we were designated to guard our last flag and cover the flanking routes. Without those guys pushing hard behind the lines to cap and hold the forward flags we would have certainly lost.

This is just bad logic asylum...most people would choose a player like my nephew who regularly gets .50 KDRs over others because he learned objectives>kills in objective modes period
---
A tiger doesn't lose sleep to the opinions of sheep
PSN: Spetsnaz420
YeahBwoi
Posted 1/19/2013 5:59:08 AM
Hiruseki posted...
No. You have a negative k/d because you're bad.


Qft.

I know this is quite the shocker, but it is possible to play the objective AND to have a positive K/D at the same time.
Jump to Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  
Page 1 of 14 | Next | Last