Friend and I were discussing something I found interesting.

#1Bad0CompannyPosted 10/7/2012 4:33:16 PM
Ok, so as much as we hope it won't happen, I'm sure we all know there is a good chance some things will be unbalanced at launch, op guns and such. Now my friend and I were talking about this, and it got brought up that maybe instead of nerfing guns they could just reduce the amount of points you get for a kill using said gun. Thoughts? I know the crutch kiddies are going to automatically say no, because how else could they get their high kill streaks, but what do the other players have to say about this?
---
Steam & XBL - xNo L1m1tZx, Origin - xNoL1m1tZx
Currently playing BF3, Recon only, go ahead, cry some more.
#2LoshadtPosted 10/7/2012 4:36:32 PM
No, that's a bad idea. If the gun is TRULY overpowered, it should be nerfed.

Overused =/= Overpowered.
---
Russian is my first language, so yes there may be a spelling error or two.
I <3 Jesus.
#3irishman5705Posted 10/7/2012 4:36:41 PM
That may honestly be one of the worst ideas anyone's had on this board, which is saying something.
---
GT: Irish H2
"Oh, my bad, I was high on gamefaqs again" - Oblivion
#4Who_ate_the_piePosted 10/7/2012 4:36:52 PM
Sounds too complicated. It's best to just keep the amount of points per kill the same for every gun.
---
I don't care.
#5cifer520Posted 10/7/2012 4:37:18 PM
C'mon mayne.
#6Bad0Companny(Topic Creator)Posted 10/7/2012 4:40:11 PM
From: Loshadt | #002
No, that's a bad idea. If the gun is TRULY overpowered, it should be nerfed.

Overused =/= Overpowered.


But I'm sure you can agree that overpowered usually results in overused.

From: irishman5705 | #003
That may honestly be one of the worst ideas anyone's had on this board, which is saying something.


Never said I agreed with it nor that I don't, but until you can get an actual reason why it would be bad your not contributing anything to this thread.

From: Who_ate_the_pie | #004
Sounds too complicated. It's best to just keep the amount of points per kill the same for every gun.


More complicated than nerfing a gun, just to need to be nerfed again or buffed, whatever be the case?
---
Steam & XBL - xNo L1m1tZx, Origin - xNoL1m1tZx
Currently playing BF3, Recon only, go ahead, cry some more.
#7Who_ate_the_piePosted 10/7/2012 4:49:57 PM
Bad0Companny posted...
More complicated than nerfing a gun, just to need to be nerfed again or buffed, whatever be the case?


I mean say a kill is 100 points per kill, people are probably going to forget that using said gun is only 75 points per kill or whatever. They would also have to take into account the all the killstreaks too. In the end, a nerf would be better.
---
I don't care.
#8HeartlessCharmsPosted 10/7/2012 4:53:05 PM
irishman5705 posted...
That may honestly be one of the worst ideas anyone's had on this board, which is saying something.

---
PSN = Heartlessmac
Xbox Live = Munch Emm
#9Foxx3kPosted 10/7/2012 5:18:27 PM
Reminds me of that thing they tried with Counter Strike once...
---
[LanParty nF4 Ultra-D] [AMD64 3700+ San Diego] [2x 1gb Corsair XMS 3-3-3-8] [2x 250gb Barracuda] [Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS] [X850XTPE]
#10Erupt50Posted 10/7/2012 5:36:00 PM
irishman5705 posted...
That may honestly be one of the worst ideas anyone's had on this board, which is saying something.


Nuff said
---
PSN- Erupt50 XBL- Erupt50