Call of Duty: Black Ops II
I hope the suppressor actually has a drawback in this one
- Back To:
- Board List
- Topic List
- Topic Archived
Faust_8 posted... Red dot on a FAMAS? Are you kidding me? And this. I think said poster is trying to do a : (argument.) "well I met this one guy who used ___ and ___ so therefore said attachment is the best set up EVAR!" --- "You can build a thousand bridges, and never be known as a bridge builder. But **** one goat, and you'll forever be known as the man who ***** goats" | |
im playing it now suppresor take 2 squares away from range and 1 square away from damage | |
rcdude1990 posted... im playing it now From what I've experienced. . . In-game stats are lie. | |
xXYOLOx420Xx posted... rcdude1990 posted...im playing it now Although I know it's true. >.> It's a conspiracy to mess with our minds. --- "You can build a thousand bridges, and never be known as a bridge builder. But **** one goat, and you'll forever be known as the man who ***** goats" | |
I always use a silencer, never use red dot. Mostly I have ext mags +silencer on am AR. Kd of 2.5, doesn't affect me. No gun attachments have drawbacks except the silencer, what more could you want done? | |
Let me recap what I think needs to be done: - The range drop off penalty is fine, as according to Denkirson's stat charts the range at which your gun does full damage is around a third of what it would be otherwise The problem? Minimum damage is still way too high for this to matter. (ex. the Famas does 35 before drop off but falls to 25 at min range, so it goes from 3 shots to kill to 4) The solution? Keep the current range penalty but have suppressors lower the minimum damage. This will at least penalize weapons with extremely high RoF's at range and encourage the play style suppressors are meant to entail - CQC. *This is all based off BO data and how it might carry over to BO2 --- ADD, no. Where is the thread for Fallout OCD players? "We have to keep it on page 3 or it freaks out." | |
PathlessBullet posted...
You can't make it overly punishing or you make it unusable. It might be feasable if you kept its max damage intact up until damage drop off (the normal range of the weapon without a silencer) but make it drop to 5 hits instead of 4. | |
cwatz12 posted... PathlessBullet posted... It's not unusable though. It just encourages you not to be a stealth clown and not be undetectable shooting across the map. --- ADD, no. Where is the thread for Fallout OCD players? "We have to keep it on page 3 or it freaks out." | |
PathlessBullet posted... cwatz12 posted...PathlessBullet posted... If you put the range penalty PLUS a damage penalty noone would ever use it. Never. Dropping the damage would be fine, IF they kept the range intact. You seem to also be missing the point that you have to benefit from putting an attachment on a weapon. Your suggestion makes a silencer worse than a gun without it. | |
cwatz12 posted... If you put the range penalty PLUS a damage penalty noone would ever use it. Never. No, rushers would use it over campers then since you would have to be up close to kill at maximum efficiency. --- ADD, no. Where is the thread for Fallout OCD players? "We have to keep it on page 3 or it freaks out." |
- Back To:
- Board List
- Topic List
- Topic Archived
