BO2 at least introduces some new ideas into the franchise, whether we agree with them or not. The game probably got the score it deserves, not on par with the greats, not a terrible game, but a good game with replayability. It does have most of the same elements used in previous games, just rehashed into a different setting, but nothing too innovative.
H4 has NOTHING new to show. Halo is the same game it has been since the beginning. GS gushes over that game, with some game player called tsquare doing halo buttlove stories everywhere. Most hyped rehash of old ideas in years.
SAME enemies, SAME weapons, SAME environments, SAME vehicles, SAME characters, SAME story. BORING. Nothing critical said about halo anywhere on GS.
Seems like GS is getting paid alot of money to stay biased towards Halo above all others.
Gamespot are Halo fanboys, thats actually a qualification you need to work there --- "They must find it difficult...those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." Xbox Live Gamer Tag: Guneagle01
Both games are pretty good in terms of doing new things in the sequel.
Plus both games are selling amazingly. So what's the big deal? Just play your game.
Also your blatant disregard for the facts that Halo has entirely new enemies, environments, weapons, and story makes you seem extremely dumb. --- July 18, 2011: The day Capcom lost my support. RIP MegaMan Legends 3 GT: Ragtag 21
Honestly we already know Microsoft paid reviewers off to only give 9's or above (they have plenty of money to do it and it forces a lot of people to buy an Xbox). Just a few days ago they even claimed "It's the biggest U.S. entertainment launch of the year". --- Xbox Live GT: Nnnking