GS gives BO2 an 8.0 and Halo 4 a 9.0
Theres a lot of new in these trailers.
That took a whole 30 seconds to find.
BO2 gets horses. Halo gets mechs.
Pokemon White FC- 3181-5466-9991
From: EnVy_CaLiBeR | #070
vashtricham posted...Quote:Personally don't listen to Gamespot unless it's Kevin Van Ord reviewing. He's a good reviewer.
Exactly my point a review is an opinion no more no less. Do your own research and play what you enjoy. No need for any fight on what game did what.
Xbox live GT:PorKsTerR
BO2 at least introduces some new ideas into the franchise, whether we agree with them or not. The game probably got the score it deserves, not on par with the greats, not a terrible game, but a good game with replayability. It does have most of the same elements used in previous games, just rehashed into a different setting, but nothing too innovative.
Oh boo hooo. And much of what you said..isn't true.
Same Environments..Same Enemies and weapons? Did you forget about the entire new species..planet..and weapons that were added? What about the drop dead gorgeous graphics..and that sound...so much better than hearing some obscure "Boom" every 10 seconds in the background.
They also added Spartan Ops..a weekly..story based co-op event. But in the end..its personal preference, not saying COD is crap..but you're obviously living in a world of misinformation.
From: EnVy_CaLiBeR | #070vashtricham posted...Quote:Personally don't listen to Gamespot unless it's Kevin Van Ord reviewing. He's a good reviewer.
No arguments there.
Every numbered Halo had numerous changes in single and multiplayer. If you say otherwise you are either blinded by your hate of the series and or/ haven't even tried them. I don't even an xbox and so i don't have much time with xbox games. I can still see that they try some new ideas and improvements every time there's a major title.
CoD on the other hand... I do give Treyarch credit for at least trying add something to the series since the Infinity ward sure as hell didn't.
This post is now 20% cooler.
I disagree with some of your points. There are plenty of new weapons, several new enemies which fighter very differently from the Covenenant, not to mention Spartan Ops and the multiplayer. Is it brand spanking new? No. But is it fun and fresh? Hell yeah.
macarena69 posted... "That's the point. I can do it, you can't stop me, I gain nothing from listening to you, come on me bro"
From: EnVy_CaLiBeR | #104
PorKsTerR posted...From: EnVy_CaLiBeR | #070vashtricham posted...Quote:Personally don't listen to Gamespot unless it's Kevin Van Ord reviewing. He's a good reviewer.
I know I'm sorry just kind of saying that to everyone else.
Xbox live GT:PorKsTerR
So if there are no armor unlocks that give you abilities sir TC, explain how some people in halo can jet pack, shield, or dash?
And uhm, what's wrong with customizing your halo armor? Been waiting for that for so long, kicking but and looking uniquely bad@$$ is great
Well I think EGM only gave Halo 4 a 7.5 TC, due to basically the reasons you said and they have BLOPS 2 a 9.
And..EGM knocked off points because there were no iron sights.......sure, people can have their opinions..but sometimes opinions can be wrong.
ssj5king posted...NGd72 posted...Halo 4 is miles ahead of Bops2
Where are these facts? The only reason why this game took so long was because a new developer was making it, not Bungie. Don't fool yourself. Because it took so many years for MS to put out the same Halo game it has had for sale since the last Halo game doesn't mean it's any good. Face it, it's the same game over and over again. COD is not much different.
Just because it took long to make a game doesn't mean it's any good. Face it halo fanboys, Halo 4 has barely anything new. The same old grunts/elites/spartans/worlds (that all look the same)/multiplayer (ohh don't forget the cool new "forge" that we've never seen before). Sorry haloboys, you waited three years for the same game you got last time, I know disappointment is hard to deal with, but that's what you got.