Do You Agree with The 4.3 Metacritic Rating?

#41SupremeArticlePosted 11/15/2012 7:24:58 PM
UAV's have been here since the dark ages complaining about it now is like complaining about lag
i love my girl cedes aka hoohahxchz
#42Mr_arizonaPosted 11/15/2012 7:25:29 PM
I agree with the small map ad spawn issues but I think those go hand and hand. The medium to large maps are much better but they do need to do away with spawns right behind you. Had a enemy spawn 10feet next to me at the same time. I ended up killing him before he took 2 steps.
#43HaganPosted 11/15/2012 7:27:49 PM
PastyPCNerd posted...
from the reviews, i've gathered that the game has:

- small, maze-like infinity ward maps, with a million entrance to any one part of the map
- no recoil
- extremely fast kills: just hold down fire, and strafe until 3 bullets find their target
- engine starting to show its age
- UAV whoring makes it easier for scrubs to get kills; UAV has no counter
- strategy has been removed, since everyone is always on the radar

many people were stating that this was just a remake of MW3. what does gFAQs think? this probably wouldn't be a good buy for a black ops fan, right?

most of this is true
XBL GT= illidan z - last video uploaded Blops II FFA game 11/13
#44TheManlyManateePosted 11/15/2012 7:30:48 PM
Disagree wholeheartedly. Right now I give it a 7/10. I'm struggling in MP and the spawns/hit detection kind of irk me. If that gets fixed, and footsteps become a little more clear, this game would be an 8.5/10 for me.
Now Playing: Mass Effect 3, Borderlands 2, Assassin's Creed III
#45Hyrulesaver123Posted 11/15/2012 7:30:52 PM
The same things happened with MW3. BF trolls and general haters post really crappy reviews to lower the score. 9/10 of those people probably haven't even played the game and are taking it from other things they read.
Steam ID: FalsifyTheTruth; Currently Playing: Bordlerlands 2
#46outlawstar289Posted 11/15/2012 7:35:12 PM
I would give this game an 8.5/10

COD as a series is gettng old but this game was a good effort
GT: Commando GMC
#47lnknprk_45Posted 11/15/2012 8:03:09 PM
There's no possible way you could agree with the 4.3. Even if you don't like the game there's just no way it can be seen as a 4.3. 4.3 is straight up trolling the review. I'm not saying it should a 9 minimum because it's not, I'm just saying a 4.3 is just an unreasonably low score for a game like this. The campaign alone should put it around 7.