You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
Cos Far Cry 3 just came out they only have 1/10th of the COD budget yet the game is fifty times more fun got a Map Editor better graphics a better campaign and endless replay value.
Sales numbers are saying Black Ops 2 sales are down by huge amounts.
Kotick gave a $500 mil number but thats cos Black Ops sales account for worldwide while MW is only US and Europe , so in reality MW3 sold way more cos its the better game.
What do YOU think is the reason that Activision got so lazy with COD? I mean just look at the campaign and get any good friend who has some common sense, all will say MW campaigns all look way better than the BO campaign.
Look at zombies its actually less content than in BO1 and its all recycled plus way too dark. Its a step back.
Multiplayer is good. I like BO2 Multiplayer. But only MP alone does not justify $60 especially if they refuse to give the fans a Map Editor.
Hope nobody here gets mad I wish everyone a great week have a date tomorrow with a hot female student she is a 10/10 wish me luck :) Am trading in BO2 for Far Cry 3 whenever I find time. Cos nobody probably can disagree that SADLY its the worst cod of all time.
It has the worst maps easily in my opinion -- even worse, for the most part, than MW3. This makes me want to call the game the worst as maps are so integral, but I like a lot of the features, so I'm split.
World at War was worse. That game had the worst gun balance. SMGs clearly outclassed assault rifles. It's a little humorous how much people complain about them in every game when it hasn't been nearly as bad since.