We're going to punish you for hosting...

#61inkf301Posted 12/9/2012 10:14:40 PM
The TC is a fool. Can't even get the talking points right, doesn't understand how laws get passed or budgets either. And you people that want to parrot what your loopy friend says on Facebook as if it were fact, you need to really study more.

The act as proven since 1909, breaks for the wealthy and top tier incomes lead to ruin. Your precious budget plan from the conservatives wouldn't balance the budget and improve the deficit for 40 years and that is from Paul Ryan's own budgetary documentation. Mind you that is assuming there are no other economic issues such as prolonged war and no social security. Again from the Republican Budgetary Commission. So stop talking like you have any knowledge at all about this, because it is evident that you don't.

And another thing, Republicans in the House failed to pass a budget for the 3 years they had control over it. Oh, let me guess, you actually thought a President can make the budget by himself?

The republicans voted unanimously against ending the oil company tax breaks. The oil companies posted record profits of over 400 billion dollars but the conservatives in Washington voted to give them over 50 billion dollars in tax breaks.

If you try to say lower corporate taxes means more job creation, you are wrong again. Companies hire because the business is there. If it isn't then all the saved tax money goes where exactly? Here's a hint, not to the employees or new jobs.

Your conservative buddies also decided to nearly unanimously vote against an international treaty that would bring American laws protecting the disabled to other countries. Because why? They are crazy and can't see that our own laws are already beyond this treaty. They are so anti-Obama that they will vote against anything that he approves of.

Anyway, your lack of knowledge on anything so far mentioned in this thread both annoys me and astounds me. Please educate yourself on the topics at hand before you choose to speak on this again.

If you read though this and are angry, then offense intended.
#62nuschler2212(Topic Creator)Posted 12/10/2012 6:20:35 AM
Draconilian posted...
Socialism, you keep using that word

I do not think it means what you think it means.

And I kick ass when I host.


According to some stupid thing called the Encyclopedia Britannica:

"socialism, social and economic doctrine that calls for public rather than private ownership or control of property and natural resources."

Examples of Obama socialism would be "little things" like the attempt to keep energy production in the hands of the government (by cutting private company permits for production dramatically), converting private health care into public (through ObamaCare) and buying the controlling interest in GM (then, of course, GIVING 17.5 % of its common stock to the UAW union).

Very few historic leaders, including dictators, have managed such a socialist agenda in only four years as Obama.

But nice Princess Bride reference. Misplaced and inaccurate, but I enjoyed it nonetheless.
---
I put my pants on just like the rest of you, one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on, I write brilliant posts.
#63DXiRoNMaNPosted 12/10/2012 6:22:39 AM
I agree with TC, why am I punished for having a modern connection and people with Walmart connections circa 2003 are rewarded for being cheapskates
---
XBL- DXiRoNMaN PSN- DXiRoNMaN WiiFC- 7177 5213 2278 2695
"I'm like the only smartest one on this board with like 5 other people." - some moron
#64nuschler2212(Topic Creator)Posted 12/10/2012 6:22:48 AM
MCGTP posted...
TC, you've been complaining about everything under the sun since MW3 (and probably before that but I don't care to check). Why don't you just accept the fact that you're not good at CoD?


Except I enjoyed the first two weeks.

And my k/d is 1.70 or higher in every CoD I've played, including this one. And my w/l ratio is rather good considering the amount of games I have to leave to get a playable game.

But your argument (you're bad, the game is good) is always the "go to" argument for those who can't defend a games problems.
---
I put my pants on just like the rest of you, one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on, I write brilliant posts.
#65shadowsofdawnPosted 12/10/2012 6:23:02 AM
nuschler2212 posted...
And if you back out (not dashboard) you won't be able to play the game at all for five minutes as a punishment.


I back out of a ton of game (often when I'm the host) and I've never gotten a time out. You guys must be backing out of every game you play.
---
\o/ Administering jolly ass-whoopings everyday.
.||
#66nuschler2212(Topic Creator)Posted 12/10/2012 6:32:35 AM(edited)
inkf301 posted...
The TC is a fool. Can't even get the talking points right, doesn't understand how laws get passed or budgets either. And you people that want to parrot what your loopy friend says on Facebook as if it were fact, you need to really study more.

The act as proven since 1909, breaks for the wealthy and top tier incomes lead to ruin. Your precious budget plan from the conservatives wouldn't balance the budget and improve the deficit for 40 years and that is from Paul Ryan's own budgetary documentation. Mind you that is assuming there are no other economic issues such as prolonged war and no social security. Again from the Republican Budgetary Commission. So stop talking like you have any knowledge at all about this, because it is evident that you don't.

And another thing, Republicans in the House failed to pass a budget for the 3 years they had control over it. Oh, let me guess, you actually thought a President can make the budget by himself?

The republicans voted unanimously against ending the oil company tax breaks. The oil companies posted record profits of over 400 billion dollars but the conservatives in Washington voted to give them over 50 billion dollars in tax breaks.

If you try to say lower corporate taxes means more job creation, you are wrong again. Companies hire because the business is there. If it isn't then all the saved tax money goes where exactly? Here's a hint, not to the employees or new jobs.

Your conservative buddies also decided to nearly unanimously vote against an international treaty that would bring American laws protecting the disabled to other countries. Because why? They are crazy and can't see that our own laws are already beyond this treaty. They are so anti-Obama that they will vote against anything that he approves of.

Anyway, your lack of knowledge on anything so far mentioned in this thread both annoys me and astounds me. Please educate yourself on the topics at hand before you choose to speak on this again.

If you read though this and are angry, then offense intended.


I read a few sentences. Full of lies.

The House passed a budget. Several in fact. Harry Reid (D), majority leader of the Senate refuses to bring any budget to be considered. Including Obamas.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/334928/reid-wont-allow-vote-obamas-fiscal-cliff-plan-katrina-trinko#

In fact, when Reid DID allow a vote in 2011 and early 2012, the Senate has voted down Obama's proposed budgets 99-0 and 97-0. Astounding.

Next lie I can debunk?
---
I put my pants on just like the rest of you, one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on, I write brilliant posts.
#67nuschler2212(Topic Creator)Posted 12/10/2012 6:44:49 AM(edited)
FYI....

FACT: The major oil companies pay more in taxes and have higher tax rates than the vast majority of companies that exist.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2012/04/16/which-megacorps-pay-megataxes/

FACT: GM is given numerous tax breaks for the specific purpose of appearing to make a profit.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704462704575590642149103202.html

FACT: The US has the highest corporate tax rate IN THE WORLD. Kind of shuns business and jobs, stuff that democrats don't care about.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/31/fact-of-the-day-1-corporate-tax_n_1711318.html

FACT: GE paid NO federal taxes. By the way, GE's CEO Jeffrey Immelt is a close, personal friend of Obama and was even appointed as the head of Obama's Jobs Council (which rarely meets).

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/general-electric-paid-federal-taxes-2010/story?id=13224558#.UMX0f4PaJT0

Stupid facts always getting in the way of a good Liberal lie.
---
I put my pants on just like the rest of you, one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on, I write brilliant posts.
#68JohnWall32Posted 12/10/2012 6:52:06 AM
maximo posted...
KabtheMentat posted...
Fun fact: Dedicated servers wouldn't solve the problem.

You bring up Battlefield. How many times have you been shot while going around a corner or wall or ducking behind cover only to die several feet after the fact? I've played a hell of a lot of BF3 and it constantly happens. It's not as noticeable on larger maps because you're more concerned not being strafed by an aircraft or run over by a tank. But if you've played stuff like rush Metro, it's pretty common.


Dedicated servers would make the game (BO) a better experience.

If you compare the technical performance of BF vs Black Ops. BF is far superior and at least you kow that you are not at an immediate disadvanage by not being a host.

There are too many technical problems plaguing BOs to list...

I'll give you another example:

I played a lot of Gears too. Gears 3 moved to dedicated servers and the perfomance improvements are considerable compared to the mess that was Gears, especially Gears 2.

COD series MP is becoming a dinosaur.


youre clueless
#69nuschler2212(Topic Creator)Posted 12/10/2012 6:54:05 AM
JohnWall32 posted...
maximo posted...
KabtheMentat posted...
Fun fact: Dedicated servers wouldn't solve the problem.

You bring up Battlefield. How many times have you been shot while going around a corner or wall or ducking behind cover only to die several feet after the fact? I've played a hell of a lot of BF3 and it constantly happens. It's not as noticeable on larger maps because you're more concerned not being strafed by an aircraft or run over by a tank. But if you've played stuff like rush Metro, it's pretty common.


Dedicated servers would make the game (BO) a better experience.

If you compare the technical performance of BF vs Black Ops. BF is far superior and at least you kow that you are not at an immediate disadvanage by not being a host.

There are too many technical problems plaguing BOs to list...

I'll give you another example:

I played a lot of Gears too. Gears 3 moved to dedicated servers and the perfomance improvements are considerable compared to the mess that was Gears, especially Gears 2.

COD series MP is becoming a dinosaur.


youre clueless


Why is he clueless?

How would having dedicated servers, which the majority of the community want, make the game less playable?

Please explain.
---
I put my pants on just like the rest of you, one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on, I write brilliant posts.
#70Jason_HudsonPosted 12/10/2012 7:00:43 AM
When I'm the host, I pull the plug and end the game. I just punished a team of campers.
---
"My name is Spartan Jay, the greatest MW3 player of all time. Because I am on your team, this team will win" ~ Spartan Jay