Whats your k/d now and what would it HONESTLY be without lag problems

Back To: Board List | Topic List | Topic Archived
First | Previous | Page 6 of 7 | Last
Buddha1187
Posted 12/16/2012 9:47:39 AM
2.05

2.05
---
DoubleTap868 - " Oh my bad. Spoiler Alert: George Washington survives the Revolutionary War."
Seminolehitman
Posted 12/16/2012 9:56:46 AM
In this game it is 1.22 in every other FPS including all Halo's I played I was 1.87-2.02. The reason I mentioned halo if you don't know apparently Halo takes talent and CoD doesn't. FYI I always had a higher K/D in Halo games.
---
Some people say a cucumber taste better pickled
Crynix
Posted 12/16/2012 10:08:27 AM
Blacks Ops 2 has horrible server connectivity. Some people have a good connection, some have horrible connectivity. But the hosting by bridging off a player connection is what ruins a connection for others.

One player could have a perfect connection, straight in the green; running around the map with out any lag or screen delay. But then another player will be skipping paces like they're running on dial up speed. But where else have I seen that on a constant basis? Every single Modern Warfare, except 4. Well four had it's problem, which turned into bigger problems with hackers. But none the less, it wasn't a bad game for connections.

When it comes to lag, it's a luck of the draw inspired by having a decent internet provider. I had better connection with AT&T DSL hook up, than with Comcast Highspeed Internet; but I went from wired to wireless which explains that.

I rented Black Ops instead of buying it, I was that skeptical. It's not worth buying at $60, and I'll simply wait the 3 months for it to depreciate to about $30 to even contemplate buying it.

I liked Black Ops 1 though, I played that game on my birthday November 9th with a Slurpee and cigar in my mouth. Going 8:2 to 27:0 the entire night, connection was supreme and flawless for the most part. But Black Ops one also has the issue of Point Recognition, meaning the bullet doesn't go where the cross-hairs aim it to go. Which will be repaired with an update, some lag confusion, then a whole lot of complaints from those who die from the recalibration of bullet lining.
Crynix
Posted 12/16/2012 10:11:52 AM
Crynix posted...
Blacks Ops 2 has horrible server connectivity. Some people have a good connection, some have horrible connectivity. But the hosting by bridging off a player connection is what ruins a connection for others.

One player could have a perfect connection, straight in the green; running around the map with out any lag or screen delay. But then another player will be skipping paces like they're running on dial up speed. But where else have I seen that on a constant basis? Every single Modern Warfare, except 4. Well four had it's problem, which turned into bigger problems with hackers. But none the less, it wasn't a bad game for connections.

When it comes to lag, it's a luck of the draw inspired by having a decent internet provider. I had better connection with AT&T DSL hook up, than with Comcast Highspeed Internet; but I went from wired to wireless which explains that.

I rented Black Ops instead of buying it, I was that skeptical. It's not worth buying at $60, and I'll simply wait the 3 months for it to depreciate to about $30 to even contemplate buying it.

I liked Black Ops 1 though, I played that game on my birthday November 9th with a Slurpee and cigar in my mouth. Going 8:2 to 27:0 the entire night, connection was supreme and flawless for the most part. But Black Ops TWO also has the issue of Point Recognition, meaning the bullet doesn't go where the cross-hairs aim it to go. Which will be repaired with an update, some lag confusion, then a whole lot of complaints from those who die from the recalibration of bullet lining.


Errors
Also
2.5 in Black ops one.
Then 3.0 in blac ops 2 cause I only played a few games and returned it.
AllInVane
Posted 12/16/2012 10:13:05 AM
2.53

I don't get lag.. I get shot around corners when I'm running. Idk I don't think it'd be higher
---
Nobody currently cares what your playing.
slipknotrox765
Posted 12/16/2012 3:04:41 PM
.13 now


without lag it would be 5.5 - 6
---
GT: UPSEToPENGUINS
Cornbread4life
Posted 12/16/2012 3:06:44 PM
I went from between a 2.5-3 in 1, and my career in 2 is I think a 1.14. Miserable.
---
GT: Cornbread4life
I'm loud, obnoxious, vulgar, and impaired by "substance abuse" 99% of the time. You've been warned.
flagg2kplus
Posted 12/16/2012 3:11:36 PM
2.3 and it would be 2.3 with out the "lag problems".

I dont make excuses.

If you are bad you are bad.
---
My favorite game of the year
http://youtu.be/lTuayBk_NyY
T_r_a_m_P
Posted 12/16/2012 3:13:01 PM
To high to comprehend lol naw probs low 2.whatever
---
Gamertag: BuSteD TramP
Ewgh thats gotta hurt!
Foxx3k
Posted 12/16/2012 3:15:31 PM
BO2 - 1.73

BO1 - 3.8
WAW - 3.8
MW3 - 2.8, I think?
MW2 - 2.6 I think?
MW1 - 2.4 I think?
...

Without lag I'd expect to be somewhere around 2.6-2.9.
---
[LanParty nF4 Ultra-D] [AMD64 3700+ San Diego] [2x 1gb Corsair XMS 3-3-3-8] [2x 250gb Barracuda] [Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS] [X850XTPE]
Jump to Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  
First | Previous | Page 6 of 7 | Last