The price of DLC should reflect how much work went into it. For a multiplayer map pack, I'd say $2 per map is a fair value, given the average size and detail of call of duty maps. Obviously, a larger scale game would charge more for a map pack, given that much more time or manpower is required to release it. Perhaps the zombies maps would cost more, given that they are larger and usually require more thought.
Losers will fight their battles, winners will fight their wars.
Why would this be considered paying Activision the money they deserve? All Activision does is force the developers to create a new Call of Duty every year, when instead of that, they could be actually making some really well-developed games every couple of years.
Am I missing something? This guy makes an obvious troll topic to provoke people that are already annoyed with the way the game runs. Then people that make flame posts get moderated yet the topic has 80+ posts already?
Close the topic mods. Blatant trolling seems to be allowed and even encouraged on this website.