Who's better. A solo player with a 2.0 or a player who always plays in a party..

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. Who's better. A solo player with a 2.0 or a player who always plays in a party..
2 years ago#81
AaronHutch posted...
supercoolisaac posted...
2 k/d and barely over 1 w/l is terrible.


but when the average k/d is like .6 and a W/L of .2, ^those stats automatically make you an exceptional player


I love when people say the average K/D is anything other than 1. For every kill, there is a death, therefore the average Kill/Death is 1. Not 0.6 or 1.5 or anything else.
---
GT: Stelthmastr
2 years ago#82
trakrunr4evr posted...
AaronHutch posted...
supercoolisaac posted...
2 k/d and barely over 1 w/l is terrible.


but when the average k/d is like .6 and a W/L of .2, ^those stats automatically make you an exceptional player


I love when people say the average K/D is anything other than 1. For every kill, there is a death, therefore the average Kill/Death is 1. Not 0.6 or 1.5 or anything else.


Except dashboarding and suicides screw that up.
---
\o/ Administering jolly ass-whoopings everyday.
.||
2 years ago#83
shadowsofdawn posted...
trakrunr4evr posted...
AaronHutch posted...
supercoolisaac posted...
2 k/d and barely over 1 w/l is terrible.


but when the average k/d is like .6 and a W/L of .2, ^those stats automatically make you an exceptional player


I love when people say the average K/D is anything other than 1. For every kill, there is a death, therefore the average Kill/Death is 1. Not 0.6 or 1.5 or anything else.


Except dashboarding and suicides screw that up.


That's true I didn't think of that. Please excuse my idiocy.
---
GT: Stelthmastr
2 years ago#84
I've been playing Domination a lot lately (really the first time since CoD4), and I'm that solo player with 2.0 K/D (in Domination, 1.67ish overall) > , 350ish SPM, around .9ish W/L, and is always capping/defending flags. I seem to be the rare player that is pretty decent.
---
GT: xFrostxPhoenix
Now Playing: BF3, DC 2 Waiting for: MW3,Skyrim, ACR...Monster Hunter is the **** btw.
2 years ago#85
I mostly play solo and the majority of my time is in 6v6 TDM, KC, and Domination, where I have a win percent of somewhere around 58% (so around a 1.4 W/L). In free-for-all (where everyone is a solo player, essentially), I have a win percent of around 95% (19 W/L).

In other words, it is quite hard for a solo player to get a high W/L in team-based modes; comparing solo players and team players using W/L as a basis is difficult because as a solo player, skill does not necessarily correlate with winning the game. This applies even more in Ground War, where there are more players on your team that could potentially drag you down.
---
Spring Contest 2005 - Final Score - 77/80
2 years ago#86
Well the difference depends on their skill level and it's that simple. Trying to find out via their stats is just an awful idea. I've trounced my share of parties of braggarts with 2+ KDs because they didn't have cooperation, though. It's really true that excelling in a party requires a few members to take advantage of teamwork.
---
Xbox Live: xXSpaceFlowerXx
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. Who's better. A solo player with a 2.0 or a player who always plays in a party..

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived