Why was COD 4 the best again?

#11BoyWitArabStrapPosted 1/26/2013 8:54:47 PM
Uh definitely nostalgia. Yeah, the maps were great, but here are the reasons why 4 isn't as good.

- Not enough weapons
- Only three K/S's
- SP and Jugg = pointless
- 3x grenades
- Launcher
- RPG = useless
- Lack of perks
- Lack of attachments
---
Mas tragem Lucifer pra mim
Em una bandeja, pra mim
#12TheManlyManateePosted 1/26/2013 8:55:35 PM(edited)
Haahahaha posted...
MW2 and black ops are the beat cods. Black ops 2 is fun but not better. It doesnt test skill its just about holding your head above the water as long as possible because TTK is redic


MW2 guns probably had the fastest TTK guns out of all the CoDs.
---
Now Playing: Fallout 3, Borderlands 2, CoD: BO2
#13fatclemenzaPosted 1/26/2013 8:57:10 PM
From: BoyWitArabStrap | #011
- Not enough weapons
- Only three K/S's
- SP and Jugg = pointless
- 3x grenades
- Launcher
- RPG = useless
- Lack of perks
- Lack of attachments

Bold = reasons the game was best
Italics = what are you even talking about
---
Advertising signs, they con you into thinking you’re the one
That can do what’s never been done, that can win what’s never been won
#14phatdragon13Posted 1/26/2013 8:57:37 PM
Maps, weapon balance, simplicity
---
XBL Gamertag: nygiantsfan22
#15HaahahahaPosted 1/26/2013 8:58:55 PM
TheManlyManatee posted...
Haahahaha posted...
MW2 and black ops are the beat cods. Black ops 2 is fun but not better. It doesnt test skill its just about holding your head above the water as long as possible because TTK is redic


MW2 guns probably had the fastest TTK guns out of all the CoDs.


While that may be arguably true. There is a shot at survival every kill or death is dictated by aim and shots registered. In black ops 2 its all about lag and camera issues. I cant run from a fire fight unless The attacker attacks too early in black ops2. In mw2 i have a shot 90% of the time since Im aware of possible cover most of the time sub consciously
---
SoulSilverFC~ 4126 3793 3849
#16_Xymemaru_VPosted 1/26/2013 9:01:05 PM
BoyWitArabStrap posted...
Uh definitely nostalgia. Yeah, the maps were great, but here are the reasons why 4 isn't as good.

- Not enough weapons
- Only three K/S's
- SP and Jugg = pointless
- 3x grenades
- Launcher
- RPG = useless
- Lack of perks
- Lack of attachments


dude you just listed every reason why 4 is the best. Well except for the 3x nades but all of those is why it's better than it's successors
---
http://i47.tinypic.com/5bo6qu.jpg http://i49.tinypic.com/2qb514x.jpg http://i45.tinypic.com/24wznmd.jpg http://i48.tinypic.com/e63x50.jpg
#17VelociswaggerPosted 1/26/2013 9:01:30 PM
fatclemenza posted...
From: BoyWitArabStrap | #011
- Not enough weapons
- Only three K/S's
- SP and Jugg = pointless
- 3x grenades
- Launcher
- RPG = useless
- Lack of perks
- Lack of attachments

Bold = reasons the game was best
Italics = what are you even talking about


QFT
Although Three K/S's could be argued against. Variety is the spice of live. Attachments are nice too.
---
Operator rH
#18fatclemenzaPosted 1/26/2013 9:06:15 PM
From: Velociswagger | #017
Although Three K/S's could be argued against. Variety is the spice of live. Attachments are nice too.

Fair. I was thinking once that there could have been choices for 3/5/7. Like UAV or CUAV for 3, Airstrike or Predator-type thing for 5, Hovering helicopter or patrolling helicopter for 7, that sort of thing.

I would have liked a non-sight or silencer attachment for some guns too. Mainly the AK47/74u since both attachments hurt them, so naked was the best choice.
---
Advertising signs, they con you into thinking you’re the one
That can do what’s never been done, that can win what’s never been won
#19ItIsAPsyBorgPosted 1/26/2013 9:06:52 PM
It's a nostalgia thing. People liked COD4 because it was set in the modern era and popular at the same time. World at War had superior maps and remains the only truly unique COD gameplay wise (SMG pseudo-dominance offset by maps that support multiple playstyles and reward creative use of the map, unscoped sniping, mountable LMGs, etc), but it got flak from the gaming media for being "more of the same" and it wasn't as hyped for that reason.

This being said, COD4 *is* very good in comparison to what we have today: namely, MW2, MW3, and this game. It's considerably less broken. I don't blame people who want to go back to it, as I'm actually one of them.
#20_Xymemaru_VPosted 1/26/2013 9:18:07 PM
when will people learn less is more. CoD4 was about player v player. Anyone who is upset at the lack of things the game had sucked and needs 1000 different things to carry them to their precious positive K/D

CoD started sucking when they added a s*** ton of stuff to appeal to casuals and bad players
---
http://i47.tinypic.com/5bo6qu.jpg http://i49.tinypic.com/2qb514x.jpg http://i45.tinypic.com/24wznmd.jpg http://i48.tinypic.com/e63x50.jpg