Call of Duty: Black Ops II
Total time played? Also, are you buying PS4 or Xbox 720?
Back To: Board List | Topic List | Topic Archived
elchris79 posted... Brostache posted...elchris79 posted...I think you're right. Back when the last consoles were released they were absolute cutting edge, maybe not in pure processing power but in the boxed system. Now, people are hugely underwhelmed by the stats they're showing, doubting that the AMD over Intel thing both next gen consoles have is anything less than hugely short sighted and underpowered, and just thinking the grass might be greener. If steam box can show console like ease with pc like tea bagging of consoles I will happily pay 3 to 4 times more for a consistently superior console like experience. I do not want my console to allow me to check Facebook, or watch Netflix. I have other things for that. I want pure gaming power and accessibility. I think it's a reasonable ask, especially with Steam being relatively unattached to profit whoring at the mo. Full disclosure i have no love for valve/steam. As an old school PC gamer, getting home with my boxed copy of half life 2 and being forced to sign up for steam made me and most PC gamers at the time livid with the draconian DRM of valve. Its the first instance of a single player PC game i can remember, that required an online connection to play. I still have a chip on my shoulder ;) I also cant imagine a steam box really panning out logistically, if it uses a controller... playing online against KB/M users would be digital suicide. So the need to use a KB/M would would negate the usefulness of having a compact PC capable of sitting under the tv. They cant sell the hardware at a loss as they dont have licensing fees for games to make up the diference, and they probably cant bargain much with hardware manufacturers to lower costs as they dont have a proven market nor guaranteed sales volume. Just from a practical standpoint, it seems like it will probably end up just being an overpriced computer in an HTPC case. Which probably isnt going to attract much interest from console or PC gamers. | |
3 Days To be honest there is a massive variety of systems coming out, im going to wait and discuss with friends before I make any speedy decisions. Will definitely be purchasing a OUYA or Gamestick in june, but haven't decided what one yet. --- Official Chaos Uchigatana of the Dark Souls Board. | |
Brostache posted... DarkPizzel posted...U didnt need an 8800 in 2k5. I was rocking a 6600 gt on an old athlon dual core. I was running bf2 on med just fine. Those werent even out til late 2006. I hear ya on all points. It has always annoyed me in the pc world some devs just push the graphics too much and makes it harder for a broader audience. It does seem that is changing a little. Steambox and such may make devs not nake these cpu/gpu hog games like crysis 1 ,arma 2 gta4 so they can make more sales. Also f2p is the new big thing on pc so making games unplayable wont make them money --- Q9300@2.8 ghz , Msi 750i P7N, 4gb gskill MSI gtx 560 Ti Twin Frozer Win 7 64 bit | |
DarkPizzel posted... Wookie_Is_Back posted...DarkPizzel posted...Im reusing a 560 ti, hdd and psu. Yes, I realize they're not at max settings. However, I've seen Skyrim on the lowest settings and the 360 ****s on that. Same with battlefield. Both games are gorgeous on the 360 and even moreso on PC. Thing is, the console is the same price as a decent video card + processor. Then you gotta buy the case, RAM, PSU, sound card if you want, HDD, KB+M, speakers and a MOBO. Consoles are cheaper, they always have been and always will be. Not to mention they have the party aspect in their favor. I can't take my tower somewhere and have 3 people plug in their controllers and we play splitscreen. | |
Wookie_Is_Back posted... DarkPizzel posted...Wookie_Is_Back posted...DarkPizzel posted...Im reusing a 560 ti, hdd and psu. I never said pc was cheaper..i even said that a few posts back. Ive seen skyrim batman and bf3 on xbox and pc. Even on low the pc versions blow the xbox versions away. Its not even close. Maybe if u play the pc version on 1024x768 or some other crap resolution. 1080P only for me. --- Q9300@2.8 ghz , Msi 750i P7N, 4gb gskill MSI gtx 560 Ti Twin Frozer Win 7 64 bit | |
I didn't know xbox 360 was so advanced compared to PCs when it first came out. Looks like that won't be the case for either console this time | |
murdokthegreat posted... I didn't know xbox 360 was so advanced compared to PCs when it first came out. Looks like that won't be the case for either console this time That's the big problem for a lot of folk. Back then it was 'wow, NEED this'. As years went on it got very stale, even with programmers optimising what they had to work with. The next gen would only have been next gen 3 years ago. They've got disgustingly complacent, and think their integration with web services will save them. For people who lve games it certainly shouldn't. | |
While that may be true, we have to ask what's the extra benefit of having a cutting edge-graphic powerhouse vs a still very significantly optimized gaming console compared to last gen. I think gaming consoles have reached the point where extra powerful specs won't lead to anything spectacularly different than cutting edge. If games can be ran at 60fps in ultra HD running at 1080p with a $400 price, I'd rather buy that than the console that runs at 80fps in ultra HD running at 1080p with a $700 price. | |
3 minutes, no --- You wanna make me a sandwich? | |
After looking at the articles on the Steam Box, I may actually get that at some point. Seems like if it is done right it can be the killer of the other consoles. --- GT: Boomer and Tank Pretty darn confident..... I don't want to have to wait till the Microendony XBOXS 4ii comes out another 15 years later.... |
Facebook
Twitter