Rapid fire deductions not close to being accurate.

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. Rapid fire deductions not close to being accurate.

User Info: 2200rms

2200rms
3 years ago#1
When you put it on guns with good range and accuracy to begin with it automatically makes them the worst handling smgs even though the stats don't show that much of a difference. Why is it so misleading.

User Info: fatclemenza

fatclemenza
3 years ago#2
because in-game stat bars have been trolling since at least CoD4
Advertising signs, they con you into thinking you’re the one
That can do what’s never been done, that can win what’s never been won

User Info: 2200rms

2200rms
3 years ago#3
I dont think anyone uses it anymore. At all. Was it because all the complaints from BLOPS 1 and MW3. Why even bother putting it in the game.

User Info: fatclemenza

fatclemenza
3 years ago#4
BO1 SMGs for the most part needed Rapid Fire to compete with the FAMAUG.
Advertising signs, they con you into thinking you’re the one
That can do what’s never been done, that can win what’s never been won
  1. Boards
  2. Call of Duty: Black Ops II
  3. Rapid fire deductions not close to being accurate.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived