For The Next Call Of Duty (Dot) (Dot) (Dot)

#11ThatOnePotatoPosted 3/15/2013 10:05:36 PM
runaway0417 posted...
It needs to be on 2-discs.
One disc is for Multiplayer, and the other is Campaign and ETC.

So more people can work with more for on Multiplayer, as a whole disk dedicated for online, like a dedicated server, and also would give more RAM, so x2 maps, guns, challenges, more ways to play, more game modes, more room for DLC maps and weapons.

I always thought that CoD's DLC's should be like BF3, like the game comes with like 35-ish guns.
Every DLC, and i guess the magic number is 4 DLC's, should have more Spec-ops\Survival\Whatever else to the 1st CD, while the 2nd has the 5 or maybe now 6 maps, plus 5 added multiplayer features, 2 guns, 1 perk, 1 Kill\Score\Pointstreak, and maybe something else, like an equipment, or another one of the above.

But TIMEOUT...this is CoD, they would've charged this like $75, plus $20 on DLC...and im not going to be surprised to be seeing to pay-to-play online, online pass. (I'm also not going to be surprised to see a wild troll appear and add "Oh, and pay for bullets. -_-"

My wishlist for the next CoD, Multiplayer-only wise;

- Dedicated Servers

- Bring back the following game modes;
1) War
2) Drop Zone
3) Old School Modes
4) Third Person
5) Sabotage
6) Party Games
7) Multi-Teams
8) Faceoff Games
9) Hardpoint
10) Team Defender

- Bring Back the MOAB, but in a way to make it impossible to have any assistance from anything else. If this sounds stupid, how about 35 Gunstreak, with no KS's at all attached, not even a Specialist, and it HAS to be from your gun, no BB's and Claymores hidden in the back of the map getting alot of kills.

- More maps, more detailed maps, maps that are dynamic, like the train's in Express, and ETC, but 2-3 times as much, and are on every map

- More challenges for guns, more gun unlocks, more colorful camos, etc.

- Try to be at the top of your game at patching glitches, and cheats, and etc, PLEASE?

- Actually derank people, not, "Oh, he has over 9000 unstoppable medals, he must be legit, lets not derank""Meanwhile that guy goes 3-42 every game." And why are options there if you don't punish for abusing them, like Vulgar Lang?

But really, this makes so much sense, does anybody agree?

I actually agree.
Most of this stuff makes so much sense, i have no clue why people are hating so much nowadays, like really...
But no, the DLC's are overpriced for much less, the game itself has nothing on it, as most of the memory is held up by Campaign. So if it was on another disc...then they have no excuse to make the game have more.

And you forgot to ask to bring back decoy grenades and underbarrel flamethrowers. XD.
---
Black ops 1 Zombies <3
#12zxrax_alt_1Posted 3/15/2013 10:07:06 PM
You could've just put "..."

durr
---
http://twitch.tv/vraage | GT: v Raage
i7-3820 @4.875GHz | 2x HD7970 | 16GB 2000MHz | Rampage IV Formula | 250GB 840 SSD +2TB | Custom Watercooling | 1440p IPS
#13runaway0417(Topic Creator)Posted 3/15/2013 10:09:37 PM
ThatOnePotato posted...
runaway0417 posted...
It needs to be on 2-discs.
One disc is for Multiplayer, and the other is Campaign and ETC.

So more people can work with more for on Multiplayer, as a whole disk dedicated for online, like a dedicated server, and also would give more RAM, so x2 maps, guns, challenges, more ways to play, more game modes, more room for DLC maps and weapons.

I always thought that CoD's DLC's should be like BF3, like the game comes with like 35-ish guns.
Every DLC, and i guess the magic number is 4 DLC's, should have more Spec-ops\Survival\Whatever else to the 1st CD, while the 2nd has the 5 or maybe now 6 maps, plus 5 added multiplayer features, 2 guns, 1 perk, 1 Kill\Score\Pointstreak, and maybe something else, like an equipment, or another one of the above.

But TIMEOUT...this is CoD, they would've charged this like $75, plus $20 on DLC...and im not going to be surprised to be seeing to pay-to-play online, online pass. (I'm also not going to be surprised to see a wild troll appear and add "Oh, and pay for bullets. -_-"

My wishlist for the next CoD, Multiplayer-only wise;

- Dedicated Servers

- Bring back the following game modes;
1) War
2) Drop Zone
3) Old School Modes
4) Third Person
5) Sabotage
6) Party Games
7) Multi-Teams
8) Faceoff Games
9) Hardpoint
10) Team Defender

- Bring Back the MOAB, but in a way to make it impossible to have any assistance from anything else. If this sounds stupid, how about 35 Gunstreak, with no KS's at all attached, not even a Specialist, and it HAS to be from your gun, no BB's and Claymores hidden in the back of the map getting alot of kills.

- More maps, more detailed maps, maps that are dynamic, like the train's in Express, and ETC, but 2-3 times as much, and are on every map

- More challenges for guns, more gun unlocks, more colorful camos, etc.

- Try to be at the top of your game at patching glitches, and cheats, and etc, PLEASE?

- Actually derank people, not, "Oh, he has over 9000 unstoppable medals, he must be legit, lets not derank""Meanwhile that guy goes 3-42 every game." And why are options there if you don't punish for abusing them, like Vulgar Lang?

But really, this makes so much sense, does anybody agree?

I actually agree.
Most of this stuff makes so much sense, i have no clue why people are hating so much nowadays, like really...
But no, the DLC's are overpriced for much less, the game itself has nothing on it, as most of the memory is held up by Campaign. So if it was on another disc...then they have no excuse to make the game have more.

And you forgot to ask to bring back decoy grenades and underbarrel flamethrowers. XD.

(Slow Clap)...Thank the Heavens, a Normal, NOT troll of a person. I was losing hope on the GameFAQ's community lately, all full of ******** trolls who have nothing to do all day besides sit on their *** and **** around all day. I think my updated version of my Sig. Fits it all in a nutshell.

Decoy grenades....Mmmm.
---
This Is GameFAQs. Where You Ask A Simple, Honest Question and get Ambushed by Trolls.
The Cow Says: Moo! The Doggie Says: Bow Wow! The Doctor Says: Die!
#14ThatOnePotatoPosted 3/15/2013 10:14:33 PM
runaway0417 posted...
ThatOnePotato posted...
runaway0417 posted...
It needs to be on 2-discs.
One disc is for Multiplayer, and the other is Campaign and ETC.

So more people can work with more for on Multiplayer, as a whole disk dedicated for online, like a dedicated server, and also would give more RAM, so x2 maps, guns, challenges, more ways to play, more game modes, more room for DLC maps and weapons.

I always thought that CoD's DLC's should be like BF3, like the game comes with like 35-ish guns.
Every DLC, and i guess the magic number is 4 DLC's, should have more Spec-ops\Survival\Whatever else to the 1st CD, while the 2nd has the 5 or maybe now 6 maps, plus 5 added multiplayer features, 2 guns, 1 perk, 1 Kill\Score\Pointstreak, and maybe something else, like an equipment, or another one of the above.

But TIMEOUT...this is CoD, they would've charged this like $75, plus $20 on DLC...and im not going to be surprised to be seeing to pay-to-play online, online pass. (I'm also not going to be surprised to see a wild troll appear and add "Oh, and pay for bullets. -_-"

My wishlist for the next CoD, Multiplayer-only wise;

- Dedicated Servers

- Bring back the following game modes;
1) War
2) Drop Zone
3) Old School Modes
4) Third Person
5) Sabotage
6) Party Games
7) Multi-Teams
8) Faceoff Games
9) Hardpoint
10) Team Defender

- Bring Back the MOAB, but in a way to make it impossible to have any assistance from anything else. If this sounds stupid, how about 35 Gunstreak, with no KS's at all attached, not even a Specialist, and it HAS to be from your gun, no BB's and Claymores hidden in the back of the map getting alot of kills.

- More maps, more detailed maps, maps that are dynamic, like the train's in Express, and ETC, but 2-3 times as much, and are on every map

- More challenges for guns, more gun unlocks, more colorful camos, etc.

- Try to be at the top of your game at patching glitches, and cheats, and etc, PLEASE?

- Actually derank people, not, "Oh, he has over 9000 unstoppable medals, he must be legit, lets not derank""Meanwhile that guy goes 3-42 every game." And why are options there if you don't punish for abusing them, like Vulgar Lang?

But really, this makes so much sense, does anybody agree?

I actually agree.
Most of this stuff makes so much sense, i have no clue why people are hating so much nowadays, like really...
But no, the DLC's are overpriced for much less, the game itself has nothing on it, as most of the memory is held up by Campaign. So if it was on another disc...then they have no excuse to make the game have more.

And you forgot to ask to bring back decoy grenades and underbarrel flamethrowers. XD.

(Slow Clap)...Thank the Heavens, a Normal, NOT troll of a person. I was losing hope on the GameFAQ's community lately, all full of ******** trolls who have nothing to do all day besides sit on their *** and **** around all day. I think my updated version of my Sig. Fits it all in a nutshell.

Decoy grenades....Mmmm.

Yeah, i feel you man. I'll come on here, ask a simple question, and the first 5 replies are always something like, "Are ya stupid TC?"...which idk what TC even means, TBH, but why can't you give a real answer, and not mess around?
Nobody thinks that your funny trolls.

But back to the topic at hand...this will never happen, due to the greed of the CoD Developers, who charges 400MSP for a tiny little Zombie map...like WHY? Nuketown is so small.

Im not sure if i can take CoD anymore, mainly it's community.
---
Black ops 1 Zombies <3
#15runaway0417(Topic Creator)Posted 3/15/2013 10:16:05 PM
Word
---
This Is GameFAQs. Where You Ask A Simple, Honest Question and get Ambushed by Trolls.
The Cow Says: Moo! The Doggie Says: Bow Wow! The Doctor Says: Die!
#16CyCoCripPosted 3/15/2013 11:16:00 PM
but hold on.
i own COD 2, 3, 4,W@W, MW2, BO1, MW3, BO2

BUT i also own bad company 2, and battlefield 3 premium edition..

i play way more battlefield 3 now than i do cod..

the maps are huge...so games last LONGER
SNIPING is awesome, and only good players can do it, there is no..CRUTCH
vehicles!!!...TANKS, JETS, HELI's and JEEPS, o my..

need i say more...o..and u dont rank up super fast...
---
Xbl = Coqui Viejo
#17SpikeTheSpaceCowboyPosted 3/16/2013 10:34:44 AM(edited)
runaway0417 posted...

SpikeTheSpaceCowboy posted...
Is he serious? You sound like you have no idea what your talking about...

RAM on disc? Ummm... Dedicated servers on disc???

I think I might have had a stroke from reading this.



Did i actually say, word to word, RAM and DS's was on the disk?
No...i didn't.
But, the developers are the ones who decide on that for the game, so if you look at it from my POV...kinda is, and isn't. Can't complain about that really.



Your POV is that of someone who doesn't really know what they are talking about.

It needs to be on 2-discs.
One disc is for Multiplayer, and the other is Campaign and ETC.

So more people can work with more for on Multiplayer, as a whole disk dedicated for online, like a dedicated server, and also would give more RAM, so x2 maps, guns, challenges, more ways to play, more game modes, more room for DLC maps and weapons.


I don't see how being on 2 different discs would allow for more RAM use even if you were talking about actual console RAM. 2 discs would allow for more content of course, but it would have nothing to do with allowing dedicated servers and more RAM use. A game could be on a mini DVD and still have dedicated servers and use just as much RAM as that of a game on multiple discs.

Oh, and it's not "word to word" it's WORD FOR WORD. I think you not only don't have a very good grasp on game lingo and tech, you also have trouble with the English language.
---
GamerTag: MA5T3R SPIKE
"Stay smart"
#18runaway0417(Topic Creator)Posted 3/16/2013 7:49:18 PM
SpikeTheSpaceCowboy posted...
runaway0417 posted...

SpikeTheSpaceCowboy posted...
Is he serious? You sound like you have no idea what your talking about...

RAM on disc? Ummm... Dedicated servers on disc???

I think I might have had a stroke from reading this.



Did i actually say, word to word, RAM and DS's was on the disk?
No...i didn't.
But, the developers are the ones who decide on that for the game, so if you look at it from my POV...kinda is, and isn't. Can't complain about that really.



Your POV is that of someone who doesn't really know what they are talking about.

It needs to be on 2-discs.
One disc is for Multiplayer, and the other is Campaign and ETC.

So more people can work with more for on Multiplayer, as a whole disk dedicated for online, like a dedicated server, and also would give more RAM, so x2 maps, guns, challenges, more ways to play, more game modes, more room for DLC maps and weapons.


I don't see how being on 2 different discs would allow for more RAM use even if you were talking about actual console RAM. 2 discs would allow for more content of course, but it would have nothing to do with allowing dedicated servers and more RAM use. A game could be on a mini DVD and still have dedicated servers and use just as much RAM as that of a game on multiple discs.

Oh, and it's not "word to word" it's WORD FOR WORD. I think you not only don't have a very good grasp on game lingo and tech, you also have trouble with the English language.

...Perhaps because French was my first Language?
Goodness, why is there always that one Grammer Nazi in every board? Disrespectful.
Avoir une bonne journée madame, s'il vous plaît aller, parce que personne ne vous aime. Au revoir!
---
This Is GameFAQs. Where You Ask A Simple, Honest Question and get Ambushed by Trolls.
The Cow Says: Moo! The Doggie Says: Bow Wow! The Doctor Says: Die!
#19GiglioroninomPosted 3/17/2013 1:11:49 AM
TC stands for Topic Creator. The more you know. But all of the stuff you bring up is valid. I enjoyed reading these suggestions. It'd just be nice if Treyarch cared about their demographic.
---
Soundcloud.com/fiscaljackhammer
Facebook.com/1945tx
#20HydraRaptorPosted 3/17/2013 1:59:34 AM
I agree with a good bit of what you have to say, and I do like all these things in BF3, but here are some minor problems that arise when certain items were to be done for Call of Duty:

- Dedicated servers are expensive to maintain and patch, which is why PC games, and BF3 on consoles, allow users to rent servers. Activision is too cheap to for the servers out of pocket, and were they rented to users, all we would ever find is 10,000 point Domination on the smallest maps in the game and GameBattles rules servers where you get kicked for not being a tryhard. A better way for Call of Duty to work, in its primetime, at least, would to have peer to peer servers that are specifally set for certain regions, such as East, Central, and West US being seperated from each other, resulting in a better connection for everyone in the game.

- Adding weapons in a DLC pack is tricky business, especially when you do it consistently. Look at BF3's Back to Karkand expansion's FAMAS when it was first released. Generally, it was considered to be the most overpowered weapon in the game due to its high rate of fire at 1000 RPM and its very low recoil when paired with the foregrip and suppressor. The community will immediately backlash if the weapon is too good or too bad, so Treyarch/Infinity Ward would have to attempt to balance the weapon into a perfect middle ground, and that just wouldn't happen.

- Adding special killstreaks in a DLC is like asking for the game to be called "Pay to Win". Even if it were a 60 second UAV that you had to get 12 kills for, the community would cry foul.

- Bringing back the MOAB or Nuke, especially if it were in a Treyarch title, would result in a huge outcry of rage from the community, both if it were left alone or changed. If they were to add in the MOAB as a 25 gunstreak killstreak, as it was before, people would complain that it's nothing new, whereas if it were changed, people would complain because "they changed it, now it sucks".
---
Soon to be hosting Critical Hit game and movie reviews via YouTube.