C/D Flinch shouldn't be in the game

#11PatoIsGodPosted 4/24/2013 2:44:34 PM
XxOblivion77 posted...
From: fatclemenza | #002
toughness-level flinch should be default. I'm basically playing Pick 7 on all of my classes because I like Scavenger and Toughness is mandatory for even semi-serious play


I found a way around it by using Extended Clip instead of Scavenger. Also I don't use lerthyrs or tacticals since I'm used to running Specialist in MW3 where you had to play without those things.

And yeah flinch is a dumb game mechanic.


How do you use a 'lerthyr'?
#12TJ_UNLIMITEDPosted 4/24/2013 2:44:35 PM
Madsprayer posted...
I find it odd when guys talk about the C4 and various other weapons being OP and cite realism. Then in the next thread they say you shouldn't flinch when shot. Really?


This.
---
PSN- TJ_UNLIMITED
Gamertag- TJ UNLIMIT3D
#13angrybirdsdudePosted 4/24/2013 2:47:08 PM
Madsprayer posted...
I find it odd when guys talk about the C4 and various other weapons being OP and cite realism. Then in the next thread they say you shouldn't flinch when shot. Really?


who is "they" and "guys"?

some weird board hivemind? or do you think flinch is a good idea because ur bad
---
spread the <3
#14fatclemenzaPosted 4/24/2013 2:47:11 PM
From: Madsprayer | #010
I find it odd when guys talk about the C4 and various other weapons being OP and cite realism. Then in the next thread they say you shouldn't flinch when shot. Really?

I don't see a point here. Who's arguing realism?
---
His days of asking are all gone, his fight goes on, and on, and on
But he thinks that the fight is worth it all, so he strikes like Thunderball
#15Mr_PopelPosted 4/24/2013 2:48:33 PM
Well depends on what shoots me tbh, i don't see why a peashooter (SMG) hitmarker should make me flinch as much as a shotgun or sniper impact. So imo sprayer weapons that just create a hail of bullets should cause heavily reduced flinch, while hard hitting weapons should retain the current flinch.
---
Hey i'm not camping ... i'm "tactically waiting" :-D
#16timilayas99(Topic Creator)Posted 4/24/2013 2:48:56 PM
fatclemenza posted...
From: Madsprayer | #010
I find it odd when guys talk about the C4 and various other weapons being OP and cite realism. Then in the next thread they say you shouldn't flinch when shot. Really?

I don't see a point here. Who's arguing realism?


This. Nobody's said anything abut realism.
---
Go away.
#17fatclemenzaPosted 4/24/2013 2:55:23 PM
From: Mr_Popel | #015
Well depends on what shoots me tbh, i don't see why a peashooter (SMG) hitmarker should make me flinch as much as a shotgun or sniper impact. So imo sprayer weapons that just create a hail of bullets should cause heavily reduced flinch, while hard hitting weapons should retain the current flinch.

Flinch is based on bullet damage. A Tac-45 bullet flinches more than an MP7 bullet.
---
His days of asking are all gone, his fight goes on, and on, and on
But he thinks that the fight is worth it all, so he strikes like Thunderball
#18Mr_PopelPosted 4/24/2013 3:01:06 PM
fatclemenza posted...
From: Mr_Popel | #015
Well depends on what shoots me tbh, i don't see why a peashooter (SMG) hitmarker should make me flinch as much as a shotgun or sniper impact. So imo sprayer weapons that just create a hail of bullets should cause heavily reduced flinch, while hard hitting weapons should retain the current flinch.

Flinch is based on bullet damage. A Tac-45 bullet flinches more than an MP7 bullet.


To me it seems very similar ... but i probably just receive more MP7 impacts in the time it takes for one Tac hitmarker to hit me
---
Hey i'm not camping ... i'm "tactically waiting" :-D
#19SPARTAN-034Posted 4/24/2013 3:08:19 PM
Haha toughness being mandatory. Cute..
---
GamerTag: A Fluffy Lombax
I'll give you 3 words why the PS2 is a great console. Ratchet, Jak, and Sly.
#20MadsprayerPosted 4/24/2013 6:27:20 PM
fatclemenza posted...
From: Madsprayer | #010
I find it odd when guys talk about the C4 and various other weapons being OP and cite realism. Then in the next thread they say you shouldn't flinch when shot. Really?

I don't see a point here. Who's arguing realism?



Nobody in THIS thread said anything about realism. It's the constant female dogging about the blast radius of emp or C4 and things like that. Maybe off topic a bit.. apologies.