Just makes no sense to me. MW3 was the first CoD I skipped since CoD2 and from what I heard the maps and lag were bad. From what people said about BO2, the maps and lag are worse. Personally, BO2 leaves a bad taste in my mouth everytime I turn the game off. It's like a good meal with a horrible aftertaste that makes you feel like you have to gargle bleach to get rid of.
That being said, why are people so excited for Ghost given the fact that the past 2 entries have been disappointing when it comes to quality? Sure they have the winning CoD recipe at their cores, which keep people coming back, but the polish is severely lacking.
Ghosts might be pile of crap if they take out Pick Ten without a suitable replacement. So many butthurt pick 10 haters without a good reason. Not to mention IW's impulse to ignore everything treyarch. I understood the policy before when both studios just wanted to release the same game every year.
That to me means either, they will be out to prove themselves, or they will be inexperienced and get it wrong!
I may skip this one though! I have enjoyed MW3 and BLOPS2 but got bored of them pretty quick
That's exactly how I feel about BO2. I enjoy it (when it works right) but my enjoyment quickly turns to frustration about lag or extreme boredom and then I turn it off. It also doesn't help that I never seem to play the new maps unless I go to the playlist just for them.