Should Weapon Jams be added to new CoDs? - Results (162 votes)
Yes! I would love to see a Trick Shooter Jam!
13.58% (22 votes)
Hell No! Lag is bad enough!
40.12% (65 votes)
Yes but only if there is a Perk (Cleaning Kit! LMAO!)
11.11% (18 votes)
No there is already too many distractions in this game.
35.19% (57 votes)
This poll is now closed.
Thanks for playing along. These Jams will be random but very rare. I would honestly like this added. Voted #3. Give me that Cleaning Kit!!!
#2SuchAmazementPosted 8/19/2013 12:10:54 AM
LOL --- We'll bang, ok?
#3FaithInAllPosted 8/19/2013 12:16:26 AM
This is the equivalent to SSBB tripping. --- Gt/PSN/Steam: Vyeren
#4NaTesHoTPosted 8/19/2013 12:20:42 AM
No, awful mechanic and idea.
#5FeelMeUpPosted 8/19/2013 12:36:27 AM
This is the equivalent to SSBB tripping.
--- rishman5705 posted... This board is most definitely best browsed while intoxicated.
#6VeluxierPosted 8/19/2013 1:09:01 AM
Know what? I think its a good idea. But only for Snipers, specifically trickshotters, or even quickscopers. But its not random. --- Now Playing: Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate, Animal Crossing: NL NNID: Veluxier. MH3U Name: Reixulev. HR: 60+.
#7FeelMyBladePosted 8/19/2013 1:15:26 AM
It would be funny. --- Getting: CoD Ghost, GTA5, Saints Row 4 Rarity is the best Pony. Brohoof anyone? ^-^ /) ? No. of Brohoofs-42
#8BgSoAPosted 8/19/2013 2:27:35 AM
Wait. Are you all implying...
That my guns can actually...
While shooting them...
Jam. And stop firing. And require clearing in order to start firing again. Oh my lord. No. Please no please. Not in Call of Duty. Please. No. Just no. Never. Please. I beg you. I will give you my money for the DLC. Just please no gun jamming. Please no more random crap to make me die. Please. T_T --- macarena69 posted... "That's the point. I can do it, you can't stop me, I gain nothing from listening to you, come on me bro"
#9KilledByAlisaPosted 8/19/2013 4:46:27 AM
No. --- GT: Varaza Because I can http://i.imgur.com/E9hv1u9.jpg
#10CharmilePosted 8/19/2013 5:29:15 AM
Wouldn't this be lag, except not network-based? lulz --- The problem with restraining speech is, who gets to set the rules? If it's only okay in a certain time or place, who gets to say what time and what place?