Game Informer: 5/10 "Worse than a Zombie Bite"

#1Saintx13Posted 3/22/2013 7:04:13 AM
Playability:Variety is nowhere to be found. With only one enemy type and the same gameplay repeated in the same environments, Survival Instinct loses its allure fast

Entertainment:A repetitive and uneventful journey through the apocalypse

Replay:Low


http://www.gameinformer.com/games/the_walking_dead_survival_instinct/b/xbox360/archive/2013/03/21/worse-than-a-zombie-bite.aspx
#2chasingmaynardPosted 3/22/2013 7:08:53 AM
That's a little more realistic.
#3Saintx13(Topic Creator)Posted 3/22/2013 7:11:12 AM
chasingmaynard posted...
That's a little more realistic.


Generous is more like it.
#4chasingmaynardPosted 3/22/2013 7:12:36 AM
Saintx13 posted...
chasingmaynard posted...
That's a little more realistic.


Generous is more like it.


No.
#5Legit_AllmightyPosted 3/22/2013 7:13:36 AM
chasingmaynard posted...
That's a little more realistic.


Should be slightly higher. Users here give it right at a 6, but a 5 is closer than the rest of the reviews.
#6Saintx13(Topic Creator)Posted 3/22/2013 7:14:39 AM
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
#7chasingmaynardPosted 3/22/2013 7:18:13 AM
Saintx13 posted...
chasingmaynard posted...
Saintx13 posted...
chasingmaynard posted...
That's a little more realistic.


Generous is more like it.


No.


Shouldn't you be shielding your child's eyes from the world around him instead of typing? I thought you were raising a sissy.

;)


Really? You're gonna take a shot at my kid?

That's pretty low, dude.
#8Saintx13(Topic Creator)Posted 3/22/2013 7:19:17 AM
chasingmaynard posted...
Saintx13 posted...
chasingmaynard posted...
Saintx13 posted...
chasingmaynard posted...
That's a little more realistic.


Generous is more like it.


No.


Shouldn't you be shielding your child's eyes from the world around him instead of typing? I thought you were raising a sissy.

;)


Really? You're gonna take a shot at my kid?

That's pretty low, dude.


Don't pass off the blame, it's not his fault. I am just going by your own words.
#9Saintx13(Topic Creator)Posted 3/22/2013 7:25:36 AM
LOL. You scrambling to have this moderated?

I'll be happy to delete the post if it was that hard of a punch to your gut. The truth can hurt though and as everyone knows now, I come here to speak the truth.
#10shawnmckPosted 3/22/2013 7:28:14 AM
I'd say that is a generous score, considering the time & effort that went into the game.
It's being reported that the game was in development for as little as 6 to 10 months.
Those types of tactics should never be supported by anyone.

Had this game been given 2-years, it could have been a great game...
But I'm guessing that Activision didn't want to invest any time into the game with the next gen consoles coming out later this year.
If gamers wouldn't support this crap by buying their games, then this kind of shenanigans wouldn't happen.