What's worse? GILGAMESH in general or FF Type-0?

#1roxas9001Posted 10/22/2012 8:43:06 AM
go.
---
Not changing this until DmCrap flops.
I hate the FF fandumb.
#2jfielding95Posted 10/22/2012 8:43:37 AM
Neither.
#3TorgoForeverPosted 10/22/2012 8:44:44 AM
But none of those are bad
---
http://www.youtube.com/user/Nintendsonydo?feature=mhee
oFFiciAL ToRgO and tOMmy wiSEaU oF tHE qUIttinG REturneRS
#4RedSpade2712Posted 10/22/2012 8:45:08 AM
cant hate gilgamesh coz his badassness
and type-0 the same, but they wont make it on NA, so
FF Type-0
---
If you don't want to forget, don't even remember
PSN Account: Aeria33, at your service !
#5_Snowx_Posted 10/22/2012 8:46:35 AM
I don't mind Gilgamesh in his serious appearances, but when he's supposed to appear as comic relief he's decidedly unfunny.
#6MagiusNecrosPosted 10/22/2012 8:50:49 AM
This topic backfired on TC.

Either way you choose one of the 2 gets more popular on a feeble message board.

:D
---
I GILGAMESH FAN KING WILL CONQUER THE VERSUS BOARD! HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Official GILGAMESH/BARBATOS/MAGNUS of every Gamefaqs Board
#7Prpl_MerunicornPosted 10/22/2012 8:54:30 AM
Lol, look at the bitter KH fanboy.

Look at him.
---
The homunculus of ValcristPL.
#8ColonelGuilePosted 10/22/2012 8:55:56 AM
GILGAMESH fo life

And I hear Type-0 ain't that bad.
#9kupo1705Posted 10/22/2012 8:57:44 AM
Roxas.

He's just a lame version of Sora.
#10Prpl_MerunicornPosted 10/22/2012 8:58:07 AM
kupo1705 posted...
Roxas.

He's just a lame version of Sora.


Isn't Sora a lame version of Sora?
---
The homunculus of ValcristPL.