Why are people so mad about the $100 price difference?

#91Pinoy441Posted 7/30/2013 11:51:56 PM(edited)
CapwnD posted...
Pinoy441 what is your little info-graphic supposed to show? That Sony ponies list a bunch of games that nobody buys and they like to make little pictures like that?

Why doesn't that include downloaded games? Do games that were downloaded not exist in your little world?

Why does that only show games from 2010 to 2013? Why don't they show year by year going back to 2005?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:PlayStation_3-only_games: 214

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Xbox_360-only_games: 242

Acting as if this is hard info to find.

Excluding kinect/move only games

PS3:175

360:149

Then again anyone that even uses the terms sony pony, xbots, or nintendrones cannot be reasoned with so...thank god for this ignore button
---
*grabs popcorn*
#92Homie_202Posted 7/30/2013 11:54:04 PM
because most people don't want the Kinect and feel that they are forcing it on us.
#93CapwnDPosted 7/31/2013 12:35:15 AM(edited)
Pinoy441 posted...
CapwnD posted...
Pinoy441 what is your little info-graphic supposed to show? That Sony ponies list a bunch of games that nobody buys and they like to make little pictures like that?

Why doesn't that include downloaded games? Do games that were downloaded not exist in your little world?

Why does that only show games from 2010 to 2013? Why don't they show year by year going back to 2005?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:PlayStation_3-only_games: 214

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Xbox_360-only_games: 242

Acting as if this is hard info to find.

Excluding kinect/move only games

PS3:175

360:149

Then again anyone that even uses the terms sony pony, xbots, or nintendrones cannot be reasoned with so...thank god for this ignore button

So more games on the Xbox 360 but you're ignoring them because they're kinect, and I'm still seeing some games missing from that list. I see games listed on PS3 that aren't out yet, and I see games like State of Decay which aren't listed even though there is no other version of it at this time.

And you're also neglecting to list the games that are also on PC + 360 and not PS3. Can't find one of the best games from last gen on that list, REZ HD, which should be listed since they are listing other HD remake games.

People like you disgust me. You come here with your little info-graphics all 'go go Sony go!" and you have the audacity to call me the shill. I'm not the one visiting the boards of a console that I have no intention of buying.
---
Death to Videodrome, Long Live the New Flesh
#94RBakicPosted 7/31/2013 12:16:52 AM
I don't know who's mad, but 100$ is a big difference considering you can get a superior system for 100$ less.
On the other hand One has Kinect in the package. To each his own I guess.
#95synthetiksinPosted 7/31/2013 12:17:02 AM
I'm a rich guy and will eventually buy a xb1 but one hundred for crappier equipment and a camera that, based on what the kinect 1 can do, sucks? Hell, putting the PS4 aside. Why the **** would I want a kinect in the first place?
#96BloodyDove2vsPosted 7/31/2013 12:23:56 AM
owens_terrell81 posted...
I mean I know $100 is a nice chunk of money but if you are going to spend $400 on what if basically a toy whats another $100.

Plus out gives you Kinect 2.0, and for people that are knocking it have u watched the early release demos for it? The technology if amazing. This if something that really excites me, especially since all One owners wil have one, developer support should be huge!

tl;dr-if you can afford $400 for entertainment but an extra $100 is waaay too much, then you probably should wait a few years ti go next gen.


you forgot to add its Nsa supported
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sp8aNBFFaw0
#97MrSpaM111Posted 7/31/2013 12:39:56 AM
If $100 is nothing to you, either your mom is buying your console or your earning more money than the average joe, which makes your op invalid.
---
"Exactly correct TC..."
http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/691088-xbox-one/66274628
#98Evel138Posted 7/31/2013 12:57:04 AM
MrSpaM111 posted...
.........or your earning more money than the average joe, which makes your op invalid.


I most likely fall into this category, so by all means, please tell me why my opinion is "invalid".

For the record however, I see the point in not spending the extra cash on something that is of no value to you. I sure as hell wasn't going to spend 599 US Dollars on a PS3 last gen just so SONY could win a fleeting format war with HDDVD. I don't watch a whole lot of movies and having a better picture quality over DVD isn't really that important to me now that BR drives are cheap...it certainly meant jack s*** to me seven years ago.

Fortunately it didn't take SONY long to price drop........which will most likely be the case for the XB1.
---
GT/PSN: Evel138 Mad Moxxi
http://fav.me/d5g9oo0
#99CovenantPosted 7/31/2013 1:14:08 AM
So not wanting to pay $100 for hardware that isn't actually better and a gimmick that has already proven itself to suck means you shouldn't be playing videogames?
#100tr1besPosted 7/31/2013 2:23:26 AM
I don't want to start waving my hand/arm/legs around to play games.
I don't want any device seeing me jack off, picking my nose, and scratching my ball.
I don't trust M$.
My nephew have 3 360 with RROD.

$100 can give me at least 2 $50 games or many used games.
$100 can pay one of my bill.
$100 can buy me 2 weeks of grocery food.
$100 can buy diapers for the baby.
$100 can pay for my gas.
$100, I save $100 in my saving account.
$100 in US currency is a lot for 3rd world countries.