60 frames per second with less detail or 30 frames per second with more detail?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One
  3. 60 frames per second with less detail or 30 frames per second with more detail?

User Info: tadmfpole

tadmfpole
3 years ago#1
Which do you prefer? - Results (439 votes)
60 frames per second, silk smooth and fluid
55.81% (245 votes)
245
30 frames per second, I like lots of textures and details
44.19% (194 votes)
194
This poll is now closed.
This has nothing to do with PS4 vs Xbox One, I am curious to what people prefer and I am hoping to see more 60 fps titles on the new consoles. It seems most developers cram as much of this and that into a game as they can and try to dial back just enough to achieve 25~30 fps and call it good.
my current game collection
http://www.gamefaqs.com/users/tadmfpole/games/owned

User Info: TheApd_Returns

TheApd_Returns
3 years ago#2
i'd go with 60. i turn vsync off in almost all of my PC games just to maintain 60+ frames. (notable exception was D3, because screen tearing was absolutely horrendous in that)
XBL: MauryPov1ch ... BF3 (PC): Chollima ... Steam: callmaury

User Info: Vegeta_Yulaw

Vegeta_Yulaw
3 years ago#3
Why not make it an option like they did with bioshock?

I prefer smoothness than Graphical Detail.

User Info: supermoc10

supermoc10
3 years ago#4
720p, High Graphical Detail, 60fps
PSN & Xbox Live: supermoc10
"Mr Zurkon does NOT come in peace"

User Info: tadmfpole

tadmfpole
3 years ago#5
Vegeta_Yulaw posted...
Why not make it an option like they did with bioshock?

I prefer smoothness than Graphical Detail.


I am with you 110%. This is the biggest upside to PC gaming, the option to adjust detail in favor of more frames. Bioshock is the only title I own on consoles that allowed you to do this although the options were much more limited they served their purpose well. Consoles are becoming very powerful with more options and devices than ever, why can't we see more games that allow for this?
my current game collection
http://www.gamefaqs.com/users/tadmfpole/games/owned

User Info: Spetsnaz420

Spetsnaz420
3 years ago#6
TheApd_Returns posted...
i'd go with 60. i turn vsync off in almost all of my PC games just to maintain 60+ frames. (notable exception was D3, because screen tearing was absolutely horrendous in that)


No point in having the FPS higher than your display Hz...Vsync should lock you at 60FPS unless your card is struggling at a certain point and vsync being off won't change that.

I guess it depends on the game mostly. Lots of games are ok with 30FPS with the notable exceptions being FPS, racing and fighters. I still vote for 60FPS because my main genre is FPS games
Prepare for involuntary rectal focused coitus

User Info: HENTAIDOJI

HENTAIDOJI
3 years ago#7
Id take 60fps with more detail like the good developers are doing.
http://nopybot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/hentai-demotivational1.jpg

User Info: Chao_Yun

Chao_Yun
3 years ago#8
Can't we agree to kill cats?
Forest trees are greener.

User Info: A_Someone_Else

A_Someone_Else
3 years ago#9
Where's the "1080p" option?

I prefer 1080p and 60 fps, with as much detail as developers can reasonably include and still get that.

The 1080p is more important to me.

User Info: CyhortI82

CyhortI82
3 years ago#10
I never really notice a difference between 30 and 60 so I'd go with more detail.
TheTygerfire is the love of my life.
I love DLC :) Story>gameplay>>>graphics.
  1. Boards
  2. Xbox One
  3. 60 frames per second with less detail or 30 frames per second with more detail?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived