#1XBOXvsPCPosted 9/24/2013 2:20:16 PM
"That's not some diagnostic or some simulation case or something like that. That is real code that is running at that bandwidth (...) add those two together (DDR3 + eSRAM) you're getting in the order of 200GB/s."


Just keep scrolling down and looking left. There! Lmao
#2LEGEND_KILLERRRPosted 9/24/2013 2:23:16 PM
Yeah. Looking good! It was a good move on MS to add eSRAM
Look out!
#3Pokerkid777Posted 9/24/2013 2:24:39 PM
ps4 confirmed doomed, xbox #1 has won this generation.
Tennis is the sport for gods I tell you. MOTHER****ING GODS!
#4khardboredPosted 9/24/2013 2:25:36 PM
I've known this since the specs for both were released. Shrug. (It was posted somewhere else)

Also, the font on that page is magical. It makes me want to write things just to read it with that font.
As I was going up the stairs I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today. I wish, I wish he'd go away.
#5The_NightwingPosted 9/24/2013 2:25:45 PM
Nowhere in the article does it say that DDR3 + eSRAM is better than GDDR5.
#6MilesTeg420Posted 9/24/2013 2:27:19 PM
I'm no expert, but from what I've gathered regarding this issue is the eSRAM is one extra step for devs on Xbox One vs PS4. Doesn't matter if it's an extension of 360 development if PS4 and PC don't even use it. That means your console is harder to develop for than the competition.
#7MetroidFan9999Posted 9/24/2013 2:28:31 PM

Ouch =(
Xbox One = Xbone = Crossbone = Jolly Roger.
#8BrokenIcarusPosted 9/24/2013 2:28:43 PM
Nope. Anyone who believes this is delusional and probably has no clue of tech whatsoever.
#9XBOXvsPC(Topic Creator)Posted 9/24/2013 2:30:31 PM
The_Nightwing posted...
Nowhere in the article does it say that DDR3 + eSRAM is better than GDDR5.

Not better - higher (200gb/s in "real life" vs 176gb/s theoretical)
#10sworderPosted 9/24/2013 2:32:24 PM
we've known this for months

GDDR5 is still better