Dont have Facts go Off Opinions. DEBATE FOR EXPERTS!

#1Aone1987Posted 9/28/2013 11:06:26 AM
XBOX1 will have better launch games.

What makes a game better?

If you can have facts in this agrument I will get a X1.
#2SunDevil77Posted 9/28/2013 11:09:51 AM
http://tinyurl.com/lg2tkdj
---
The average lifespan of a raccoon is ~5 years.
3DS FC: 0748 2141 3539
#3Aone1987(Topic Creator)Posted 9/28/2013 11:13:32 AM
SunDevil77 posted...
http://tinyurl.com/lg2tkdj


lol what movie is that looks funny
#4coltsfan4ever31Posted 9/28/2013 11:16:29 AM
You should know better TC. Fanboys don't deal with facts or logic.
---
---"If winning isn't everything,why do they keep score?"-Vince Lombardi
#5XBOXvsPCPosted 9/28/2013 11:17:25 AM
SunDevil77 posted...
http://tinyurl.com/lg2tkdj
#6SunDevil77Posted 9/28/2013 11:18:34 AM
Aone1987 posted...
SunDevil77 posted...
http://tinyurl.com/lg2tkdj


lol what movie is that looks funny


Starsky and Hutch
---
The average lifespan of a raccoon is ~5 years.
3DS FC: 0748 2141 3539
#7Aone1987(Topic Creator)Posted 9/28/2013 11:29:59 AM
coltsfan4ever31 posted...
You should know better TC. Fanboys don't deal with facts or logic.


LMAO!! I really want to know. Not saying the games cant be better. Just never seen a legit agrument other than the few people saying PS Launch games suck.

Starsky and Hutch. cant believe I havent seen that.
#8Foxx3kPosted 9/28/2013 11:33:22 AM
Comparing two sets of data:

[Far Cry, Crysis, Crysis: Warhead, Crysis 2, Crysis 3]
[Shellshock, Killzone, Killzone: Liberation, Killzone 2, Killzone 3]

For two measurements: "Metacritic Score" and "Metacritic Userscore."
In the case of a multi-plat, I pulled the score of the highest version.

We see that Crytek has an average metacritic score of 85.4 +/- 5.4.
We see that Guerrilla has an average metacritic score of 76 +/- 12.7.

On the user side...

We see that Crytek has an average metacritic user score of 7.62 +/- 0.6.
We see that Guerrilla has an average metacritic user score of 8.12 +/- 0.6.

From this, we see that Guerilla is more variable as a developer, but on average sees a lower critical response than Crytek. On the other hand, we see a higher user score for Guerilla games . We see an enormous discrepancy in metacritic vs. userscore for Shellshock (58% vs. 8.8 - the lowest metacritic score and the highest user average!).

My Minitab license doesn't work off-network, but I'd be curious to see what happens when you throw more statistics behind this.

Please note: Everything in this post is a fact.
---
[LanParty nF4 Ultra-D] [AMD64 3700+ San Diego] [2x 1gb Corsair XMS 3-3-3-8] [2x 250gb Barracuda] [Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS] [X850XTPE]
#9Aone1987(Topic Creator)Posted 9/28/2013 12:50:44 PM
Foxx3k posted...
Comparing two sets of data:

[Far Cry, Crysis, Crysis: Warhead, Crysis 2, Crysis 3]
[Shellshock, Killzone, Killzone: Liberation, Killzone 2, Killzone 3]

For two measurements: "Metacritic Score" and "Metacritic Userscore."
In the case of a multi-plat, I pulled the score of the highest version.

We see that Crytek has an average metacritic score of 85.4 +/- 5.4.
We see that Guerrilla has an average metacritic score of 76 +/- 12.7.

On the user side...

We see that Crytek has an average metacritic user score of 7.62 +/- 0.6.
We see that Guerrilla has an average metacritic user score of 8.12 +/- 0.6.

From this, we see that Guerilla is more variable as a developer, but on average sees a lower critical response than Crytek. On the other hand, we see a higher user score for Guerilla games . We see an enormous discrepancy in metacritic vs. userscore for Shellshock (58% vs. 8.8 - the lowest metacritic score and the highest user average!).

My Minitab license doesn't work off-network, but I'd be curious to see what happens when you throw more statistics behind this.

Please note: Everything in this post is a fact.


Breakdown is? you have to excuse me Im from Facebook