So, i just read an article on the website of a famous newspaper of my country(Italy), and aside from the fact that it was biased towards Xbox it mentions that MS's online historically has always been more advanced than Sony's.
Which brings the question, what makes Live better than PSN? i never had a single problem with PSN, but i admit i never tried Live.
Farewell MGO, the first love will never be forgotten. 06/12/12
Please don't take this as me saying you are wrong, but I'm always curious when people say an article was biased. I was wondering if you could give examples. I've read articles on both sides where people say it was biased and it was simply because the article pointed out flaws in they persons preferred system.
As far as answering your question. In my experience, XBL has always been more stable, faster, and had better features than what Playstation offers. I'll admit that my experience with XBL out weighs PS+, but that is because I liked XBL quite a bit more so I was willing to pay for it over PS+.
For quite a few people, it comes down to preference. I know in my circle, it seems more people prefer Live. But I also know that my circle is a small section of the world.
Everything is more integrated and user friendly. Party Chat. and, from my experience, a much more reliable, stable and better connection.
This. There's also the whole PSN getting hacked fiasco to consider (I think XBL has been hacked as well, but never to that degree, and never bad enough to knock the whole thing down for multiple days).
The big brain am winning again! I am the greetest! Now I am leaving Earth for no raisin!