Ryse vs. Killzone

#11Pinoy441Posted 12/28/2013 1:59:24 AM
You are comparing a hack n slash to an FPS

If you wanna compare Ryse to something you have to compare it to something akin to God of War, for Killzone something akin to CoD/BF
---
*grabs popcorn*
#12MasteroftheArtsPosted 12/28/2013 2:35:45 AM
1) They took cinematic pics from Killzone Shadowfall then compared them to some of the worst shots you could find from Ryze in order to validate their pre-existing opinion that Killzone looks the best.

2) This was particularly funny.

"Ryse sucks, ofcourse they can double the polygons because its 720p ****. 720p is less than half of 1080p pixels."

The games play completely differently and the art style is completely different. It's like comparing Crysis 3 and Bioshock Infinite.
---
"I refuse to prove that I exist" says God. "For proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing..."
#13Suppa UglyPosted 12/28/2013 7:57:06 AM
SlimeSwayze posted...
They are both bad games, so in the end, no one wins.


Exactly. Ryse DOES look more impressive but it still sucks :(
---
They'll make PSN even free-er.DeadCell222 on possible PS3 price drop
#14DaLaggaPosted 12/28/2013 8:52:38 AM
And yet Crysis 3 (PC) puts them both to shame. It's not exactly a good sign when two brand new consoles are this dated right out of the gate.

http://i5.minus.com/iY4snVh60nsdE.png
http://i1.minus.com/i7g8gtn453kHp.png
http://i4.minus.com/iblF2pepPTpzl8.png
http://www.abload.de/img/lens7qsn1.png

Heck, even something as tame as Fallout 3 with a few mods holds up far better than it should.

http://www.abload.de/img/gafgiqp7.png
http://www.abload.de/img/gaf2jgset.png
#15Mindwipe77Posted 12/28/2013 9:25:33 AM
Suppa Ugly posted...
SlimeSwayze posted...
They are both bad games, so in the end, no one wins.


Exactly. Ryse DOES look more impressive but it still sucks :(


your opinion=/= fact, i rather enjoy ryse
---
Lightning Returns, MY GOTY 2014
Proud owner of Xbox One,PS 4 and Wii U
#16SlimeSwayzePosted 12/28/2013 10:09:55 AM
Mindwipe77 posted...
Suppa Ugly posted...
SlimeSwayze posted...
They are both bad games, so in the end, no one wins.


Exactly. Ryse DOES look more impressive but it still sucks :(


your opinion=/= fact, i rather enjoy ryse


I've enjoyed bad games before too. But liking a game doesn't change the fact that it might be poorly designed and uninspired, and altogether mediocre, which is exactly how I'd describe both Ryse and Killzone. By no reasonable standard can they be considered to be quality video games, as technically impressive as they may be. They are like the Transformers films but in game form--all eye candy and no substance.
---
Currently Playing: Ass Creed 4 and P4: Golden
#17Masterchief5525Posted 12/28/2013 10:13:22 AM
Trigg3rH4ppy posted...
i'm not saying killzone might not be better because i didn't buy that for my PS4, but i do have Ryse and i can tell you those screenshots are cherrypicked to make the game look bad.


^This
---
i7-4770k | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | 8gb G.Skill 1600mhz | 2TB WD HDD | Asus Z87-A
#18FearPotionPosted 12/28/2013 10:22:11 AM
I have both and can safety say that KZ:SF is technically more impressive being naive 1080p@60fps especially for a game that wide open and not so linear and slow like Ryse.
#19SlimeSwayzePosted 12/28/2013 10:44:50 AM
FearPotion posted...
I have both and can safety say that KZ:SF is technically more impressive being naive 1080p@60fps especially for a game that wide open and not so linear and slow like Ryse.


Killzone definitely has bigger environments, but to be fair it's still pretty linear and with few exceptions the game is mainly played in tight spaces. You're absolutely right about the frame rate and resolution, though, and the game doesn't have the awkward animations and utterly brain dead AI of Ryse, even if the AI in Killzone isn't that great either.

Anyway, I'm looking forward to both games fading into obscurity, where they belong.
---
Currently Playing: Ass Creed 4 and P4: Golden
#20Ironman06Posted 12/29/2013 5:40:15 PM
Ryse looks so much better.