will titanfall have a high attachment rate?

#11nableetPosted 1/16/2014 6:09:01 AM
RawringAir posted...
From: Callmege | #005
RawringAir posted...
From: benjimain | #003
It'll attach 6 opponents to 6 others, so that's quite a low attachment compared to most modern multiplayers. Good in the 90's, but not this day and age.

Good thing we got the bots to make up for it, so that even if you're the most skilled player, your opponent can spam kill the bots to win!

Yay!


Most? Battlefield is most? lol


Um... Even Resistance 1 on ps3 had 24v24.

Also CoD, MAG, Homefront, MoH... Do you really want me to continue?


Only one of those games matters so I'm only going to comment on that one

CoD is mainly a 6v6 or less game with one bad playlist being 9v9

try again bro


Nice changing of the goal posts there, bro.

"Most? Battlefield is most? Lol"

The above is then countered with a number of modern shooters and all of sudden it is "only one of those matters".

Tut tut.
---
GT - Tyfighta23 PSN - N/A
#12RawringAirPosted 1/16/2014 6:21:28 AM
From: nableet | #011
RawringAir posted...
From: Callmege | #005
RawringAir posted...
From: benjimain | #003
It'll attach 6 opponents to 6 others, so that's quite a low attachment compared to most modern multiplayers. Good in the 90's, but not this day and age.

Good thing we got the bots to make up for it, so that even if you're the most skilled player, your opponent can spam kill the bots to win!

Yay!


Most? Battlefield is most? lol


Um... Even Resistance 1 on ps3 had 24v24.

Also CoD, MAG, Homefront, MoH... Do you really want me to continue?


Only one of those games matters so I'm only going to comment on that one

CoD is mainly a 6v6 or less game with one bad playlist being 9v9

try again bro


Nice changing of the goal posts there, bro.

"Most? Battlefield is most? Lol"

The above is then countered with a number of modern shooters and all of sudden it is "only one of those matters".

Tut tut.


He listed dead games. And they may be over 6v6 but they're dead nobody plays them I'm starting to see a trend ;)
---
Best poster on GameFAQs
You are the most irritating GameFAQs poster, correct your sig. - Crack_Fox
#13RawringAirPosted 1/16/2014 6:24:49 AM(edited)
From: Callmege | #010
RawringAir posted...
From: Callmege | #005
RawringAir posted...
From: benjimain | #003
It'll attach 6 opponents to 6 others, so that's quite a low attachment compared to most modern multiplayers. Good in the 90's, but not this day and age.

Good thing we got the bots to make up for it, so that even if you're the most skilled player, your opponent can spam kill the bots to win!

Yay!


Most? Battlefield is most? lol


Um... Even Resistance 1 on ps3 had 24v24.

Also CoD, MAG, Homefront, MoH... Do you really want me to continue?


Only one of those games matters so I'm only going to comment on that one

CoD is mainly a 6v6 or less game with one bad playlist being 9v9

try again bro


Aaaand that's where you're wrong! But as you asked and as he said multiplayer and not FPS...

WoW, GTA, Brink, Path of Exile, Diablo, DayZ, Minecraft, Racing games in general... Seriously I can keep going. 6v6 is a joke. Except one that isn't funny and they're not joking.


Titanfall is a FPS but if you want to go by that logic all those games are instantly a joke because World of Warcraft.

wait Diablo? lol thats max 4 people
---
Best poster on GameFAQs
You are the most irritating GameFAQs poster, correct your sig. - Crack_Fox
#14NejivsSasuke(Topic Creator)Posted 1/16/2014 6:33:41 AM
35% sounds like a reasonable attachment, and 6vs6 is not bad. Idk who came up with it needs to be more espically if the game in question has different mechanics than bf4 and
Also its a new IP.

No one has played the game yet they know how many players it should support based off of another developers game.
---
Gamertag: focused dude
#15nableetPosted 1/16/2014 6:58:01 AM
RawringAir posted...
From: nableet | #011


Nice changing of the goal posts there, bro.

"Most? Battlefield is most? Lol"

The above is then countered with a number of modern shooters and all of sudden it is "only one of those matters".

Tut tut.


He listed dead games. And they may be over 6v6 but they're dead nobody plays them I'm starting to see a trend ;)


I don't think the dead games bit helps you though. Looking at current "living" games we have:

Halo: allows more than 6v6
Cod: allows more than 6v6 (whether you like it, or not)
BF4: allows more than 6v6
Planetside: allows more than 6v6

Any I have missed? (FPS only)
---
GT - Tyfighta23 PSN - N/A
#16dnmtPosted 1/16/2014 6:59:23 AM
nableet posted...
RawringAir posted...
From: nableet | #011


Nice changing of the goal posts there, bro.

"Most? Battlefield is most? Lol"

The above is then countered with a number of modern shooters and all of sudden it is "only one of those matters".

Tut tut.


He listed dead games. And they may be over 6v6 but they're dead nobody plays them I'm starting to see a trend ;)


I don't think the dead games bit helps you though. Looking at current "living" games we have:

Halo: allows more than 6v6
Cod: allows more than 6v6 (whether you like it, or not)
BF4: allows more than 6v6
Planetside: allows more than 6v6

Any I have missed? (FPS only)


Team Fortress 2 and Counter-Strike.