I know kinect is one of the reasons.. but I can't see how kinect is going to appeal to people... the best exclusives aren't gonna play better with kinect.
Hey man, could you give me the winning numbers to tomorrows lotto? I could really use the cash.
Hey man, could you name me a couple of amazing Kinect games? The technology has been out for years and years on 360, you know..
Actually Kinect was ignored because not every 360 came with one, hopefully we will se better integration in the future.
I really like how it was implemented in Dead Rising and Battlefield so far but I do hope for more.
Every Xbox One came with one, and all developers of currently available titles knew this well in advance. So far it has seen the same kind of support it saw on the 360. If it is a mandatory peripheral it needs to have a reason as to why it must be purchased and for most people it has failed to do so thus far. --- my current game collection http://www.gamefaqs.com/users/tadmfpole/games/owned
To answer TC's question, yes. I think they tried too hard to focus on a market that basically doesn't know or care that this thing even exists. And in doing so they pissed off a huge portion of their original user base. --- my current game collection http://www.gamefaqs.com/users/tadmfpole/games/owned
- Tomb Raider situation - Fail at illegal Youtube "marketing" - Not offering nearly as good deals with Gold as PS+ has already given - No GDDR5 - Multiple HUGE "leaks" --- "That's NASCAR tactics." "Opinions are like magnets, nobody knows how they work." - Foppe
No. They were making what they wanted to make and then an outcry happened and they changed it up some. Just because it isn't as powerful as the PS4 doesn't mean they slacked. --- If LeBron shoots below 56 percent for the regular(obviously) season(2013-14) I'll close my account.