why not just do Tomb Raider at 720p and 60 FPS?

#31krystylaPosted 1/29/2014 7:17:55 AM
People forget so fast that the PS4 version isn't exactly 60fps either even though it runs a lot better
---
FC: 4227 - 1514- 7752 IGN:Mara PSN: JudasInHell Gamertag: Crystyn 7B
Written by Surface Pro 2 256GB
#32Rome218Posted 1/29/2014 7:18:05 AM
billsfanno1 posted...
Because 60fps isn't all that important with a game like TR.


Couldn't agree more. If it's a competitive game where more miscalculation on aiming can be a kill or a kill from the guy you're aiming at, then I can see people wanting the extra smoothness.

I would have been disappointed if this was 60 fps and 720p. This is a single player experience and I do not have a hard time pulling off head shots and dodging grenades at 30 fps.

I don't think any TR fans of last gen did either, because all loved the game.
---
http://kotaku.com/5938996/the-worst-internet-trolls-might-be-mentally-ill
#33The_DjokerPosted 1/29/2014 7:44:08 AM
If a fighting game is 30FPS then there would be and should be uproar
---
http://www.brashgames.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Wii-U-fail.jpg
#34garcia_jx(Topic Creator)Posted 1/29/2014 8:48:54 AM
dnmt posted...
bob15x posted...
but I guess when Infamous comes out and its 30fps it will be completely fine.


It will be fine because there's no other version of the game to compare it to and it still looks amazing. Exclusive games and multiplatforms are judged differently.


That seems to be the biggest complain. The majority of multiplatform games run or look better on the ps4. If Tomb Raider was the same on both consoles, there would not be an uproar.
#35zephirrainesPosted 1/29/2014 8:49:35 AM
Terry-bogard posted...
Lawboy2 posted...
lostoutlawnb posted...
ether way people will whine.


Agreed...the comparisons video looked the same to me...only if ur nitpicking can u tell the difference


The difference is VERY noticeable , you can't see it on youtube but believe me , it shows.


Stable is greater then jumpy fps anyday. Funny how people ignore this even tho even ign and DF mention that the ps4 version fluctuates so much that its more distracting then solid 30.
#36VRViperIIPosted 1/29/2014 8:55:31 AM
I bought it yesterday. Looks awesome. 1080p full anti aliasing, plays smooth as butter. Tomb raider does not need 60fps. It's not a twitch game. Gears of war even got away with 30fps. All the halo games. 60 would be nice but it is awesome at 30.

Now if ninja gaiden 4 is 60 on ps4 and 30 on xbone, I'll get a ps4.
---
"Rhaegar fought valiantly, Rheagar fought nobly, Rhaegar fought honorably. And Rhaegar died."
Valar Morghulis
#37MRL3G3NDPosted 1/29/2014 8:55:51 AM
yeah nothing should be taxing the system now...somebody needs to get fired

they tried to go the cheap way out and it bit them in the ass...
---
XBOX ONE BF4 CRAZY
http://youtu.be/wndCkss-AJA
#38yiangaruuugaPosted 1/29/2014 9:02:26 AM
Different developer ported Xbox One version while the actual developer ported the PS4 version. It's silly to think that the Xbox One can't handle 1080P 60FPS when there are already games in development/out that achieves this .
---
GT: xFrostxPhoenix
Now Playing: BF3, DC 2 Waiting for: MW3,Skyrim, ACR...Monster Hunter is the **** btw.
#39krystylaPosted 1/29/2014 9:06:03 AM
yiangaruuuga posted...
Different developer ported Xbox One version while the actual developer ported the PS4 version. It's silly to think that the Xbox One can't handle 1080P 60FPS when there are already games in development/out that achieves this .


Seeing as the PS4 version doesn't even manage to output constant 60fps and even averages around 53fps it is highly doubtful the XBO could
---
FC: 4227 - 1514- 7752 IGN:Mara PSN: JudasInHell Gamertag: Crystyn 7B
Written by Surface Pro 2 256GB
#40mikeyexcel201Posted 1/29/2014 9:16:30 AM
The_Djoker posted...
If a fighting game is 30FPS then there would be and should be uproar


or you could just skip the UPROAR and just not buy that game and go on with your life