30fps 720p is not bad at all

#21InjusticeRebornPosted 2/2/2014 5:30:19 AM
ripvision posted...
Eh, common find a better gif - Maybe like this one http://i.imgur.com/DHR7Br7.gif


XD

Best .gif of the day so far.
---
"Maybe all these clowns should chill out and stop trolling me." - MetroidFan9999
#22pleylandPosted 2/2/2014 5:41:00 AM
chedibang1994 posted...
Honestly it better have good games I don't care if the graphics look like or play damn nes games it better be worth is


But if that's the case.. why would people buy an xb1? We buy the next generation consoles because they should be an improvement. The 360 plays games at 720p at either 30-60fps.. so why not stick with that?

I think MS got the hardware just under the spec they needed. 1080p is a must this generation otherwise we may as well all stick with the old consoles.
#23R2BDSiPosted 2/2/2014 5:48:48 AM
To me it kind of is, but whatever. I'm still getting Xbone.
#24CallmegePosted 2/2/2014 5:50:05 AM
jasomramirez666 posted...
People can barely tell the difference of 30 and 60fps. Our eyes and minds don't process images super fast so its a pretty negligible difference.

Also to really enjoy a 1080p experience, you need a TV at least 50" or bigger. If you game in a TV that is around 30 to below 50" - which most people do - 720p is fine.

I think MS did a good job on taking into account how gamers play their games and focusing on futuristic gaming features. Not just buffing up an old console.


Maybe YOUR brain can't process information fast enough but most people will see a difference up to 100fps and even beyond. I don't know where you got this pseudoscientific nonsense from but take it back because it's just plain wrong.

Again, this next bit is just garbage. Maybe YOUR eyes can't see a difference between 720p and 1080p on smaller screen but those of us with 20/20 vision and/or the correctly prescribed glasses sure can. There's a huge difference between 720p and 1080p on my 32 inch.
---
God save our gracious Queen, Long live our noble Queen, God save the Queen!
not changing this sig until we have a King - started: 30/8/2008
#25Reginleif20Posted 2/2/2014 5:52:42 AM
jasomramirez666 posted...
Casuals such as myself can barely tell the difference of 30 and 60fps. Our eyes and minds don't process images super fast so its a pretty negligible difference.

Also to really enjoy a 1080p experience, you need a TV at least 50" or bigger. If you game in a TV that is around 30 to below 50" - which most poor people do - 720p is fine.

I think MS did a crappy job on taking into account how gamers play their games and focusing on futuristic gaming features and just buffing up an old console.


Fix'd
---
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it
#26hrjPosted 2/2/2014 6:03:28 AM
jasomramirez666 posted...
People can barely tell the difference of 30 and 60fps. Our eyes and minds don't process images super fast so its a pretty negligible difference.

Also to really enjoy a 1080p experience, you need a TV at least 50" or bigger. If you game in a TV that is around 30 to below 50" - which most people do - 720p is fine.

I think MS did a good job on taking into account how gamers play their games and focusing on futuristic gaming features. Not just buffing up an old console.


You´re wrong on pretty much every single point here. Well done.
---
PSN/GT - Hennaboy
#27koalabear9000Posted 2/2/2014 6:09:35 AM
720p and 30fps is just fine I agree. 1080p and 60fps is objectivily better though.
#28user_ptPosted 2/2/2014 6:25:57 AM
http://i895.photobucket.com/albums/ac158/CathyluvsMark/Mark%20Owen/Animation4.gif
#29P5r5zPosted 2/2/2014 6:33:56 AM
Spetsnaz420 posted...
Lmao how many times does this ridiculous argument need to get destroyed before people stop making it?
#30eternalblue02Posted 2/2/2014 6:48:47 AM
TC, I would think you would want more out of a next gen system.