Would COD: Medieval Warfare be better received?

#1meteor9898Posted 5/3/2014 3:01:42 PM
I don't think ripping off Titanfall and a GBA game was the way to go. If they wanted to revitalize the series, they should have gone in the opposite direction and taken shooting back to the dark ages. I don't think I've ever heard of a medieval shooter before, and I've always wondered why. Sniping with crossbows sounds pretty badass. Also they can revise history like they always do and have America invade Europe or something...but with crossbows!
#2ComradeRyanPosted 5/3/2014 3:45:21 PM
It's so crazy, it just might work.
We must reverse Citizens United, Restore our Democracy, and Save the Republic. Join the Fight for Free and Fair Elections in America!
#3Jedi454Posted 5/3/2014 3:47:13 PM
CoD is known for it's fast paced gunplay so no it wouldn't.
[Force Persuade] That is not an opinion, you are just a troll with no life.
#4AppleJeZusPosted 5/3/2014 3:47:23 PM
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare would like a big f***ing word with you.

Also, CoD: Advanced Warfare and Titanfall started development in the same year (2011) so your topic is both ignorant and irrelevant.
PSN, Steam, GT: AppleJeZus FC: 3282-2984-1471
Asrock Z77 Extreme3 || Intel i7 3770k || 16gb Kingston RAM || EVGA GTX 780ti
#5LooksLikeRainPosted 5/3/2014 3:48:23 PM
No. However, I'd be happy if chivalry got ported over.
For the love of god, stop saying 'whilst.'