XO's GPU benchmarked vs PS4's and other PC GPUs!! Results Inside!!

#71BeefEasterPosted 7/21/2014 7:05:39 AM
the hits keep comin'
---
I play with dolls: http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y153/BeefEaster/003_zps64d8bdd3.jpg
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y153/BeefEaster/001_zps33d21332.jpg
#72PLAY3R_ON3Posted 7/21/2014 7:45:31 AM
But the CLOUD! but, but DX12!... blind fanboyism is an amazing thing isn't it?
---
"Is not a Zombie is a ZOMBIEVA!" - Dr. Neil Watts "To the moon"
#73ObtikPosted 7/21/2014 7:45:41 AM
Oh my god look at that variation between the PS4 and a Current PC GPU. PS4 is twice as slow, and they are releasing new graphics cards all the time.
SONY will have to continue to pay Devs to reduce textures on PC so consumers don't realize that the PS4 is actually very weak.
#74king1988Posted 7/21/2014 7:48:36 AM
Kazuya_80 posted...
king1988 posted...
um yeah 7850 is under 100 easy I saw it a few weeks a go for like 80-90.


7570 is about that, not a 7850


Um yeah I bought 7950 sapphire boost for 140-150 so yeah 7570 for 100 is a rip off. You got to learn to shop deals people. july 4th sales there was a 7850 for under 100 after rebates and what not. for 150-200 you should be getting 7950- r9 280 possibly 280x for 2-225 if you are willing to wait for a good enough deal.
#75MasteroftheArtsPosted 7/21/2014 8:18:51 AM
king1988 posted...
Kazuya_80 posted...
king1988 posted...
um yeah 7850 is under 100 easy I saw it a few weeks a go for like 80-90.


7570 is about that, not a 7850


Um yeah I bought 7950 sapphire boost for 140-150 so yeah 7570 for 100 is a rip off. You got to learn to shop deals people. july 4th sales there was a 7850 for under 100 after rebates and what not. for 150-200 you should be getting 7950- r9 280 possibly 280x for 2-225 if you are willing to wait for a good enough deal.


There's an r9 270 up on ebay for under $100. There are several $400 PC configurations which can beat PS4 and X1. In a year, it'll likely be $350.
---
"I refuse to prove that I exist" says God. "For proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing..."
#76SculptorOvFleshPosted 7/21/2014 8:23:05 AM
MasteroftheArts posted...
king1988 posted...
Kazuya_80 posted...
king1988 posted...
um yeah 7850 is under 100 easy I saw it a few weeks a go for like 80-90.


7570 is about that, not a 7850


Um yeah I bought 7950 sapphire boost for 140-150 so yeah 7570 for 100 is a rip off. You got to learn to shop deals people. july 4th sales there was a 7850 for under 100 after rebates and what not. for 150-200 you should be getting 7950- r9 280 possibly 280x for 2-225 if you are willing to wait for a good enough deal.


There's an r9 270 up on ebay for under $100. There are several $400 PC configurations which can beat PS4 and X1. In a year, it'll likely be $350.


^This is such a load. Go build me a $400 pc, everyhting new, no refurbs. and have it run Watch Dogs. And look anyhitng near Ps4/Xbox One. I'll wait.
#77SpideyknightPosted 7/21/2014 8:24:18 AM
Just shows the ps4 is really well engineered. It's about as powerful as a 300 dollar card and is only 399, that's not bad considering all the other stuff in it.
---
For in much wisdom is much grief, and he that increaseth knowledge, increaseth sorrow.
#78cmincPosted 7/21/2014 8:45:25 AM
Which one of those ps4 graphs promises that their games will start being decent in another couple years?

All that power, ease of development, and hype...and you guys got throw away indies, killzone, infamous, a final fantasy mmo and multiplats that struggle to look and perform even 1% better. I dont get why youre not upset about this.

The biggest ps4 game this year is the one they released on ps3 last year, driveclub is a joke, no one apparently asked for lbp3 (though i think it looks great) and next years success depends on a gears clone that doesnt understand the gears formula along with a souls game that should be stellar but will still be a souls game.

Its like im in the F'ing twilight zone.
---
MSI Z87-G45 | I7-4771 Turbo | GTX 770 4GB GDDR5 | Corsair HX 850W |
8GB DDR3 | 1TB 128 MB Cache HD | Windows 8.1 | 360 | XB1 | WII U | 3DS
#79iamdanthamanPosted 7/21/2014 8:46:50 AM
KingKobo posted...
Completely useless article from wccftech, a laughingstock in the PC community when it comes to anything related to hardware.

All this "benchmark" did was literally go to this website (http://www.iyd.kr/634) and type in the corresponding numbers for each GPU. No actual testing was even done.

Also anyone capable of using common sense would have been able to tell you the approximate performance of the Xbone and PS4 based simply on the number of shader cores. The PS4's GPU has slightly more shaders than a 7850 but a good bit lower than a 7870, and performs right in between(SHOCKING!). The Xbone's closest comparison would be a 7790 which they did not include on the graph either out of sheer incompetence or desire to make it seem like the Xbone was significantly behind everything else.

Regardless this is just another disgusting example of wccftech trying to get exposure by using controversial headlines. One last thing to note is that the article was posted by the same idiot who claimed "30 FPs will always be superior for storytelling" (http://wccftech.com/30fps-vs-60fps-30fps-better-story-telling-games/) in another article and then back-tracked saying the whole thing was a joke once everyone called him out on his stupidity.


Not only that, but their two estimates were one using only the DDR3 memory, and the other using only the esram, they never even so much as attempt to estimate the theoretical performance of the actual setup, which uses both simultaneously.
---
All your base are belong to us
#80BeefEasterPosted 7/21/2014 9:15:07 AM
iamdanthaman posted...


Not only that, but their two estimates were one using only the DDR3 memory, and the other using only the esram, they never even so much as attempt to estimate the theoretical performance of the actual setup, which uses both simultaneously.


if you actually read the article you'll see they do just that

"Depending on how much they are able to utilize the eSRAM some portion of the ‘eSRAM only’ bar will be added to the lowest bar. However they cannot and never will be fully added. You will never get 23 + 27 = 50 Relative Points. Since they are utilizing the same GPU, realistically speaking the absolute maximum performance you can expect is till 32 – 35 Relative points. That is still lower than PS4 because nothing can account for the lower number of Stream Processors which is the heart of GPU horsepower. Bottom Line is, the more developers optimize eSRAM, the more frames and higher resolution you are going to get (32MB eSRAm is theoretically enough for 1080p) but even that has a limit and the PS4 will always remain at an advantage."
---
I play with dolls: http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y153/BeefEaster/003_zps64d8bdd3.jpg
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y153/BeefEaster/001_zps33d21332.jpg